It a whipping post for Creationists. No doubt about it. The ONLY Creationists who get any respect here are the ones who BEND on their beliefs and accept atleast some of the evidence in support of science. If (God forbid) you actually TRY to stand your ground you are treated like Mazzy, buzz, ICANT, ImJoseph, etc etc...Not to mention the other Creationists who were finally run off - i.e. Mike the wiz, TrueCreation etc...
Your complaint seems to be that the evolutionists disagree with the creationists. Well, the converse is also true.
Never, not once since i've been here have I seen ONE F&^%ING Evo concede ANYTHING.
Well, what should we have conceded? You mention IamJoseph. Here's one of his recent posts:
The thing gets easier if one thinks positive and negative, and that both these are post-universe factors. Once there was no light or darkness; hard to imagine, but hey - once there was no imagination either. The buck stops at the second alphabet when we backtrack; the A is barred and elusive and represents the forbidden apple metaphor. There is nothing wrong with the human brain, except its wiring is limited. We cannot even fathom a new color.
Do
you "concede" that "the buck stops at the second alphabet"? Do you even understand this? Nor do we.
If you think some creationist has made a good point about anything, you could have joined in on his side. You mention Mazzy. If you agree with him that
H. erectus is "a variety of gorilla", you could have backed him up, maybe supplied some of the
arguments that his assertions so sorely lack.
Meanwhile, if you want to see an evolutionist being convinced of something by a creationist, see
here for an example. Aaron convinced me that
Dorudon had three digits on each hind limb. How? By providing
evidence instead of screaming witless nonsense like Mazzy.
But it doesn't happen that often because of the unwillingness or inability of creationists to supply evidence for things.
Mazzy debates, and makes a LITTLE ground and gets suspended? HAHA. Please, she's endured 1000's of insults for simply PRESENTING her side and SHE gets suspended?
As were four evolutionists.
I am no longer allowed to post on that thread at all, but I don't hear you complaining.
I like how Evo hates Christians (Creationists) for standing their ground BUT that's exactly what they do themselves.
Creationists stand their ground when all the evidence proves that they're wrong. Evolutionists stand their ground when nutters scream incoherent nonsense at them.
It's a F&$%$ing wonder any Creationist are left here. You Evo's DO NOT have a compromising, agreeable, subjective bone in your bodies (save a few). It would actually be nice to see some evo's give some credit to the creationists every F%$%$ING once in a while.
You can have the credit you're due.
Yet, Creationists are always in the wrong ...
Well, yes. But that's not
our fault.
Again, I should like to ask what we ought to be conceding. Should I have conceded, for example, that
H. erectus ...
... is a "variety of gorilla" ...
... or should Mazzy have conceded that it isn't?