The evidence we've seen so far in this thread would seem to support this. No creationist has offered to explain Robert Byers' word salad that I posted in Message 49, and now you say you don't understand Buzsaw, either.
It seems to me you are dramatizing a realatively simple problem. If you have a problem with something Mr Byers said or something Buzzford said, ask then to simplify, not me.
If however it is your point presently, that I cant understand it
I will take a look at message 49, then if I dont understand it I will axe Mr byers to simplify, because then we might be able to conversate. Heck it might even be his burfday, and hell be Stayzin in a specific place, chillin up in that mug, Word.
As in RAZD's post I am going to need much claificationa and specification
We evolutionists are often told we're just too dumb or too biased or too immersed in our world view to understand what you or IamJoseph or Buzsaw or Robert Byers or John 10:10 or Marc9000 (etc., etc. and so forth) are saying, but the evidence of this thread so far indicates that you creationists have just as much trouble understanding each other as we do.
Fair enough Ill take a look. Usually however this comes down to how someone was taught or trained. It becomes a simple communication problem. not that they are untenable
Dawn Bertot
™ Version 4.2
(1)