Simply co-opting quantum physics does not make your creation theory scientific. How does your quantum improbability approach allow for falsification of anything beyond what a traditional 'God did it' creation approach does? If it doesn't then how is it in anyway more scientific?
I think you are mistaken on the basis of why creationism is unscientific. Just hiding god away behind a quantum weirdness curtain doesn't obviate the problems.
Does it not strike you that the probabilities of these quantum events are so improbable, more so by orders of magnitude than all the air molecules in a room knocking a wall down, as to be virtually impossible. Isn't this then a convincing argument that the likelihood of your theory being correct is infinitesimally small? What is causing these unique and highly specific quantum aberrances? As I said before, you haven't removed God at all, just brushed him under the quantum carpet.
And there is good evidence for devolution.
There may be, but that article on telomeres isn't it.
TTFN,
WK
™ Version 4.2
