Is Gay Marriage Immoral?

i think that was a joke, mutty.

ludo must never have watched bravo, mtv, or hbo. bravo is practically the gay-sploitation network now. it's gayer than the channel we get on digital cable that actually IS a gay and lesbian network. you mean the prostate? where else are you gonna put it?the curious point, however, is that primary function is not a good argument for either gender. the female g-spot is where it is, apparently, because it decreases pain in childbirth. much like breasts, it has been co-opted into sexual use.but of course, the point you bring up about intelligent design is a good one. presupposing there is an intelligent designer, why would he have made it pleasureable if we weren't meant to use it? there are straight couples that routinely engage in not only anal sex, but anal sex where the man is receiving. sounds to me like fundamentalists are just not very creative or imaginative when it comes to screwing... i guess it's called the "missionary" position for a reason. well, sounds to me like lesbian sex is safer than straight sex. let's make lesbianism the only legal form of sexuality. i like how even the fundies are quite as disapproving of lesbian sex as they are gay (male) sex. turns out, everyone likes lesbians. or, at least, the highly inaccurate image in their heads (and on cinemax) of lesbians.

---

not all women can even reach orgasm through stimulation of the g-spot. personally, it's usually the grotesque fake breasts that turn me off, more than anything. but i think the male mind subconciously works as follows:1 woman = good.
2 women = better.but, uh, one of my close friends in high school was a lesbian. so i'm moderately familiar with what what real lesbians are like, and i've never once met a real lipstick-lesbian. the closest i knew turned out to be bi, or rather, eventually started dating guys. well, people don't watch porn for reality. some people pretend they do, but by definition it is a fantasy. the reality of the situation is often somewhat depressing, and even when it's not, it's not all that fun to watch. i've heard some fun interviews with porn stars about how they do it at home. one in particular said "in the bed, with the lights out, in the missionary position."and if you think about it, porn is all illusion anyway. it's always strange positions (accounting for camera angles, etc), lots of different shots, lighting, and a room full of a few dozen people. it looks like sex, but it's about as far from normal sex as you can get, on top of the fantasy aspect.of course, i guess we don't think about it, do we? lol. really? people are really that dumb? i'm not sure why this suprises me. especially with guys. we're all pretty dumb about women in general -- but i bet these are the same special people that hit on and creep out all the straight girls too.i'm reminded of what kevin smith said regarding "chasing amy," that he was worried that people would take it to mean that all any lesbian really needs is "a good deep-dicking." in "an evening with kevin smith" someone got up and took objection to that very implication. i thought it was kind of ridiculous, because i know that sort of thing actually happens occasionally (see above). heh, i know a few girls that want to look like that. people want what they can't have. it's in our nature.

---