Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The folly of "authority"
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 25 (650331)
01-30-2012 8:18 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Evlreala
01-29-2012 11:07 PM


I could understand how this would grant weight behind the opinions of one with such qualifications in a field, however, this does not make their conjecture (however educated it is) anything other then conjecture and neither does it mean that they are any less required to provide evidence to support their claims.
It is perfectly valid to point to someone else's research in place of doing your own. So long as you understand that this opens you up to any criticisms their research might be worth receiving, including the fact that it may not be based on sound evidence or any evidence at all.
Jon

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Evlreala, posted 01-29-2012 11:07 PM Evlreala has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024