For example, I see a lot of atheists sound as if they already know that nothing would happen after death. It's their own faith and without proof. However, their argument may be it is because their "god" the science never say that there is anything exists (soul or afterlife and such) after death. Thus nothing will be there after death. To say otherwise will be completely not scientific and thus not acceptable.
Well, there's an abundance of proof, unfortunately.
Consider the
known connection between my brain and my mind. If you damage one part of my brain, I lose the ability to distinguish between different kinds of fruit (I kid you not). Damage another part, and I can't read or write. Damage another part, and I don't know right from wrong. Damage another part, and I lose the ability to give a damn about anything --- a doctor can tell me: "Dr A, you're dying of brain cancer", and I'll just say: "Oh, really?"
And then along comes a religious person and tells me that if
every part of my brain is
completely destroyed, then somehow I will retain
all of my mental faculties.
This is like saying: "Sure, it would disable you slightly if I cut off one of your fingers. But if I cut off
both your hands then you'll find you're not handicapped at all. Losing
one of your fingers is an inconvenience, as you say. But if you lose
all ten of them then you'll be just fine."
™ Version 4.2
