Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   North Korea there will be blood?
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 20 of 116 (695403)
04-05-2013 5:49 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by dwise1
04-05-2013 5:12 AM


Re: Another opinion
I've got a very similar opinion.
We shouldn't forget that the Young Leader is worshipped by a very large percentage of the North Korean population as a God. Eliminating him could result in total chaos . On the other side eliminating him could open the door to more openness and for the population to start realising that the young Leader was just human.
It seems as if there's really only one country which could potentially pull the rug from under the feet of the Young Leader in one foul swoop and it it would be China. One wonders what the interest of China is in keeping the North Korean Government in place or alternatively getting rid of it.
In the case of North Korea attacking South Korea, the US would be automatically involved. This will further weaken the American economy. Is it in the economic interest of China to have a further weakened American economy; with all those US dollars they keep in reserve?
One can only hope that relatively sane governments (not all of them!) know more about it than we do.
Benjamin Disraeli: -Nations have no permanent friends and no permanent enemies. Only permanent interests-

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by dwise1, posted 04-05-2013 5:12 AM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by dwise1, posted 04-05-2013 6:13 AM Pressie has replied
 Message 25 by Theodoric, posted 04-05-2013 9:18 AM Pressie has not replied
 Message 40 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-05-2013 7:21 PM Pressie has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 23 of 116 (695412)
04-05-2013 7:39 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by dwise1
04-05-2013 6:13 AM


Re: Another opinion
But what happens when a nation loses sight of its "permanent interests"?
I don't think that the current Chinese government could afford to do that. The middle class in China is getting too big and too powerful. They've got the most to loose. Keeping some dictator in a small foreign country going, at a huge financial cost and security risk to themselves, wouldn't be too acceptable to them. But, who knows? Anything is possible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by dwise1, posted 04-05-2013 6:13 AM dwise1 has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 59 of 116 (695749)
04-09-2013 5:52 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Phat
04-09-2013 5:01 AM


Re: UN Friendly Rhethoric
I completely agree.
The problem is: how can it be done with a minimum (ideally none at all) loss of human life?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Phat, posted 04-09-2013 5:01 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 110 of 116 (696296)
04-14-2013 7:20 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by jar
04-13-2013 10:25 AM


Re: US Interests
jar writes:
Maybe the US should announce that it is going to stop playing Big Brother and that the kids just need to work it out.
The problem is that any of those kids can blow up New York City or LA or Washington. Not just directly with a missile, but through other means.
Or my home, the Pretoria/Johannesburg area, with one bomb, if they really wanted and set their minds to it. They've got the technology.
I don't think that there's an easy solution to the problem of North Korea. In my view, the US presence and threats are seen as the most effective deterrents for any violence in that area. The US can annihilate North Korea quickly and effectively with a missile or two.
Not that I'm advocating it at all, it's just a fact.
China still is a key as a solution in ending the problems peacefully. But nobody knows what the plans are in China.
The US government is so much more transparent.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by jar, posted 04-13-2013 10:25 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by jar, posted 04-14-2013 8:22 AM Pressie has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024