Are we all descendants of Adam and Eve?

From the very start you rule out the possibility that humans evolved from a common ancestor shared with other species. Why not? Why don't you think evolution occurred?What evidence would you need? What features would a fossil need in order for you to accept it as being transitional between us and a common ancestor with other apes? What shared genetic marker would you accept as being evidence of the same shared ancestry? Or does the evidence not matter?

For those who deny that there is evidence that supports evolution, I would like you to help me understand your point of view. Instead of arguing about whether this or that is evidence, I would rather ask you what evidence you are actually looking for. We can even start from the perspective that life is designed, if you so choose.The real question is how would the evidence be different if evolution were true? Let's be more specific. How would these fossils look different if evolution were true, and why?http://www.theistic-evolution.com/hominids2_big.jpgIf the comparison of the human and chimp genome does not evidence evolution, then what features should be there if evolution is true? What genes should be shared that are not currently shared, and why?

To put this in a more philosophical context, this is the infamous Is/Ought problem:"Furthermore, it argues that just because someone has knowledge of how the world is (descriptive statements), this doesn't automatically prove that he knows how the world ought to be (prescriptive statements) and it is in fact impossible to derive the second based solely on the information of the first."
Is—ought problem - RationalWikiIOW, science describes what the outcome of our actions will be. Morality describes which actions we should take. The two are separate processes. Science will tell us that pushing someone off of the Empire State building will kill them. Morality tells us whether we should push them or not. In the same way, the theory of evolution tells us that if we kill everyone with a certain trait that this trait will disappear from the population. It is morality, not science or the theory of evolution, that tells us whether we should do it or not.

Nowhere in the theory of evolution does it state that we should judge a person's worth or place in society by the DNA sequence of their genome. Nowhere.Remember your rant about people being trustworthy? You have shown yourself to be a liar, a charlatan, and someone who is not trustworthy.

You are trying to claim that the theory of evolution leads to genocide and racism. That is a lie. Quoting someone spreading a lie on a website does not stop it from being a lie. The problem is that you are making claims about biology and the reality outside of the Bible. The map is not the territory.

What evidence do you have that what you claim to see is actually real?

You mean continued as in continued from the 1950's? You are seeing things. Israel has been controlled more by non-Jews than by Jews over the last 2,000 years.