A New Run at the End of Evolution by Genetic Processes Argument

Evidence: mutations cause gain of genetic diversity that were later inherited by the pure breeds.Evidence: descendants of pure breeds will increase in genetic diversity over time due to accumulation of mutations. Completely false. You didn't have to get rid of any other hemoglobin alleles in order to produce hemoglobin C, a new and rare allele that may be better than hemoglobin S at protecting against malaria.
Hemoglobin C - Wikipedia Evidence: Cheetah genetic diversity increases with each generation as new mutations are added.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

I would think that cheetahs have about the same mutation rate as humans at 35 to 50 mutations per individual per generation. If 10% of their genome is made up of alleles that affect phenotype, then 3 to 5 of those mutations will produce a new alleles at the genotype level. That's 3 to 5 new alleles per individual. This is an unavoidable consequence of mutations. It appears we have proven you wrong on that point.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

If you were digging in a field and came across a human skeleton, how would you determine if that previous living human had any living descendants simply by looking at the skeleton? The answer is you couldn't. Even if we dug up the common ancestor we wouldn't know it because morphology alone is not enough to determine direct ancestry. Here are a range of transitionals found in successive layers. Your claims are proven wrong by the simple fact that we have maybe one or two specimens for many species. If fossilization is as common as you claim, why don't we have more fossils for species that we know existed? What we want to know is why the Creator would be limited to a nested hierarchy, the very pattern of similarities that we would expect to see from evolution.

At the same time, every individual is born with mutations. As I mentioned earlier, for cheetahs we would expect 3 to 5 new genotype alleles per individual. With a population of just 10,000 individuals, that is 30,000 to 50,000 new alleles per generation. Natural selection can't remove all of them. They will accumulate and increase genetic diversity. Every generation adds new alleles in both populations. Due to the randomness of mutation, the interplay between mutations, and differences in selective pressures, the unavoidable result of this process is that different mutations will accumulate in each subpopulation causing the two populations to become less and less similar over time.As an analogy, you are trying to claim that rivers should dry up in a matter of months because they always go downhill. Obviously, you are ignoring the process that causes water to move uphill, what we call precipitation.

Why would this necessarily produce a nested hierarchy?Why would the nested hierarchy based on morphology also match the nested hierarchy based on DNA that has nothing to do with morphology? Why would the creator be unable to mix and match design features, like three middle ear bones and feathers? Why couldn't the creator be able to give a bear and a human the same cytochrome c gene with the same exact sequence while giving chimps a cytochrome c gene that differs by 10% from both bears and humans? How do you determine if a fossil is transitional or not if you aren't using physical similarities? How do you determine if a fossil is transitional or not?