Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9073 total)
82 online now:
PaulK, Tangle (2 members, 80 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,243 Year: 4,355/6,534 Month: 569/900 Week: 93/182 Day: 0/27 Hour: 0/0

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Have quantum interpretations been experimentally verified?
caffeine
Member (Idle past 262 days)
Posts: 1800
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Joined: 10-22-2008


Message 21 of 62 (794274)
11-13-2016 3:24 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by AlexCaledin
11-13-2016 1:42 PM


A question
I'm not sure I understood the passage quoted by Alex, but reading it left me with a question. Are there any macroscopic processes which quantum mechanics predicts better than relativistic mechanics? I remember that the standard textbook example of a large-scale phenomenon which classical Newtonian mechanics could not explain, but Einstein's theory of relativity could, was the orbit of Mercury. Is there a similar example for quantum mechanics? Something where our experimental setup is not dealing with individual photons or quarks, but where our macroscopic effect is different under quantum and classical interpretations?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by AlexCaledin, posted 11-13-2016 1:42 PM AlexCaledin has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022