Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Clinton Email Controversy
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 56 (794075)
11-09-2016 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Percy
11-07-2016 5:25 PM


Re: The FBI politicized? Say it isn't so!
Is this to be the FBI's position on the Clinton emails, that from now until the end of time the discovery of any Clinton emails on any device is grounds for public announcements that the investigation is being reopened so that a decision can be made anew about whether to charge her?
He said he did it because:
  • I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed
  • I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record
He also acknowledged that:
  • I don’t want to create a misleading impression
  • there is significant risk of being misunderstood
Full letter to the FBI:
quote:
To all:
This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.
Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed. I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record. At the same time, however, given that we don’t know the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails, I don’t want to create a misleading impression. In trying to strike that balance, in a brief letter and in the middle of an election season, there is significant risk of being misunderstood, but I wanted you to hear directly from me about it.
Jim Comey
sorce

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Percy, posted 11-07-2016 5:25 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Taq, posted 11-09-2016 5:36 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 56 (794144)
11-10-2016 1:56 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Taq
11-09-2016 5:36 PM


Re: The FBI politicized? Say it isn't so!
There is every reason to think that talking about any new group of Clinton emails would damage her campaign, and he did it anyway. His job was to stand by the rules of the department, even in the face of heated criticism from politicians. He failed to do his job.
I'm sorry, are you saying that it was his job to avoid doing damage to the campaign, because that's what the rules of his department are?
I am absolutely devastated that my girl lost
Yeah, Jill Stein is an outstanding woman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Taq, posted 11-09-2016 5:36 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Taq, posted 11-10-2016 3:33 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024