|
Understanding through Discussion |
|
|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
| Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
| Author | Topic: Extent of Mutational Capability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Diomedes Member  Posts: 996 From: Central Florida, USA Joined:
|
But a few silly creationists, such as Woodmorappe and Lubenow, think that Homo ergaster, Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, and Homo neanderthalensis can best be understood as racial variants of modern man--all descended from Adam and Eve, and most likely arising after the separation of people groups after Babel! Not so fast Coyote; I think the above could actually explain the standard Trump voter. :-) Kidding aside, the skulls of these humanoids are far different from that of Homo Sapiens. The only one that comes close is Homo Neanderthalenis. And even there we can clearly see cranial features different from modern man:
On a side bar, I HATE the usage of terms like microevolution and macroevolution. To me, there is only 'evolution'. Believing in microevolution but not believing in macroevolution is the functional equivalent of saying that one believes in meters but doesn't believe in kilometers.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024
