Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dawkins
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 5 of 60 (36520)
04-08-2003 6:08 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by NosyNed
04-08-2003 4:50 PM


Re: Selfish Genes
No, you're absolutely right. The whole point of the "selfish gene" idea is that our genes are "selfish" in a metaphorical sense in that any benefit they have for us is only because it also benefits the gene's chance of reproduction.
Syamasu has been on this mistaken track for years. Unfortunately it takes him a long time to learn anything.
I think one of the reasons Dawkins comes in for so much hostility from creationists is that he wrote a best selling pop-science book defending evolution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by NosyNed, posted 04-08-2003 4:50 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Primordial Egg, posted 04-08-2003 6:35 PM PaulK has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 24 of 60 (36677)
04-10-2003 2:02 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Primordial Egg
04-10-2003 1:40 PM


Re: Misunderstood...?
Zeitschrift Fuer Tierpsychologie (renamed Ethology) appears to be peer-reviewed
http://www.blackwell.de/eth.htm
The Bibliography lists a likely candidate from there :
Replicator selection and the extended phenotype
There appear to be some others which might at least touch on the subject.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Primordial Egg, posted 04-10-2003 1:40 PM Primordial Egg has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024