Hi Abogot,
I'd say
Eternal universe with infinite number of Big Bangs
The better of the current unifying theories seem to be going this route.
What makes any of the above 3 more likely and logical than a simulation and why?
A few reasons I believe.
- 1. A simulation is a man made concept. Lets give you the benefit of the doubt and say that yes, God created something along the lines of a simulation. However, since it is God who built it it's not going to be something like a human created-simulation, it's going to be something much more comeplex...like our current reality. SO if God created a simulation, since it is the only thing we know that exists, it is real in every sense of the word...Gods simulation is the reality and there is NO need to call it a simulation because it is the only one. The definition of simulation is: 'the imitation of some real thing'(wiki). SO by that definition there has to be a real reality somewhere to imitate from...why can't we just be the real thing and a simulation exist somewhere else? But then again this brings me back to the first point, and that is, simulations are a man made concept because we use them to imitate what we see. What is God seeing that he created us as an imitation of it? Another reality somewhere? If you say that he is not imitating anything else and this is the only simulation there is, then by definition you are not describing a simulation, you have described a single creation. Are you saying that you are a creationist Abogot?
- 2. It removes free will. Not in the spiritual sense, or some other philosophical sense, I just mean in our ability to choose what we want for our futures, what we want to work in, what dreams one may have and have the free will to pursue it, or not. I mean free will in that the mechanical fuction of our brains are independant from anything else in the universe.
- 3. It would require an intelligent designer. Intelligence is the by-product of evolution and natural selections applied to a planet for 3.5 billion years, whoever created the simulation had to have undergone some kind of similar evolutionary process and now you run into the same old argument of, 'who created the designer?', and NOW the added new one of 'is that designer also in a simulation? How would HE know HE was not in a simulation HIMSELF?'. It becomes one of those dreaded on going, never ending philosophical questions that I believe are un-necessary.
- 4. Specifically for the scenario I choose, (Eternal universe with infinite number of Big Bangs), alot of physicist seem to be agreeing with this one. However, it would not remove the simulation paradox, but the above 3 reasons were good enough to do that, IMO.
- 5. The last reason I believe is simply that you are making a giant leap in speculating what is factual about QM. I think your simulation paradox requires alot more from QM than we know about it.
How could you decide if we live in a simulation or not without delving into QM and what we know as "reality"? What exactly is so wrong with that?
Abogot, we don't
know anything about reality, we experience
our own particular brand of reality, and we have made sense of
it. We do NOT live in the quantum world, we cannot see the quantum world, we do not go in and out of a quantum state of reality...so to focus on a quantum mechanical world and that be how you base your understanding or
your reality seems, again, un-necessary. Enjoy understanding
your reality, it's complex enough.
Your paradox reminds me of RAZD's signature,
"we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand"
I don't know if he made that up himself but, it's very profound and seems to fit the theme of the topic. We as conscious beings have been able to understand a large portion of whats going on in our wolrd and universe, but we seem to never be satisfied with just knowing
almost enough, we have to conjure up amazing scenarios just to quench that curiosity. However, I do admit that it makes for great conversations over a couple of drinks.
Edited by onifre, : spelling
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
"All great truths begin as blasphemies"
"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky