You are grabbing at straws, really.
Even if you could come up with evidence that water could somehow retain a memory of substances under some exotic circumstances, you would still have several mountains to climb. Homeopathy has holes in it on every possible level. That's why any critical thinker will quickly classify it as so unlikely that it is not worth further consideration. Alternative explanations based on self-delusion and fallacious thinking in general are much much more plausible.
- why such predictable *selective* memory? Why wouldn't water retain memories of everything else it gets in touch with?
- how is it supposed to deliver this effect to the body to "heal"? How could this possibly be discerned from the "background noise" of all the involuntary intake of water that will inevitably have memories of SOME kind? Does application to the subject mean that the memory is perfectly wiped in the process?
- given the whole "memory" theory does indeed turn out to have substance, it still wouldn't explain how being MORE diluted is supposed to make a homepathic substance MORE effective. This aspect is SO counter anything we know, that it is just laughable!
- show us the steps taken by homeopathic pharmaceutical companies to make sure that the "water" they start with, indeed does no longer contain any residue memories. Quality control, anyone?
- keeping in mind the very naive and unscientific methodology used by Hahneman to determine the effects of each substance, what is the chance that homeopathy would actually work AFTER ALL, just by chance? I mean, one lucky shot could be believable, but being right "in the wrong way" ALL ALONG THE LINE?? I'm sorry, but you've lost me there...
The ONLY way to counter all this, would be to have double-blinded studies with a very very pronounced positive result in favor of the effectiveness. Something that could not possibly be attributed to placebo effects.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", to paraphrase Carl Sagan.
Edited by Annafan, : (spelling)