Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homeopathy
Kapyong
Member (Idle past 3473 days)
Posts: 344
Joined: 05-22-2003


Message 109 of 142 (456438)
02-18-2008 3:37 AM
Reply to: Message 79 by Rrhain
02-16-2008 7:17 PM


Re: apologies
Hi all,
quote:
Do you know what Avogadro's number is? It is the number of molecules of a substance required to have the same number in grams as its atomic weight. That is, since molecular oxygen has a molecular weight of about 16. Then if you have 16 grams of molecular oxygen, you know that you have Avogadro's number-worth of oxygen molecules.
It is about 6.022e23.
Now, if you do a dilution of 10-30, how many molecules do you think are going to be left if you only started with 1023 of them to begin with?
Pardon me Rrhain,
your analysis is good - but it assumes one starts with exactly one mole of water, which may not be accurate. Don't they start with a liter or some larger amount?
Anyway -
The break even for 1 molecule would be about 10^7 moles of water wouldn't it? That's about 180 tonnes of water?
Is that about right?
180 tonnes of water at X30 dilution would have about 1 molecule of active ingredient left?
Iasion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Rrhain, posted 02-16-2008 7:17 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by Rrhain, posted 02-18-2008 5:29 AM Kapyong has replied

  
Kapyong
Member (Idle past 3473 days)
Posts: 344
Joined: 05-22-2003


Message 111 of 142 (460427)
03-14-2008 11:20 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by Rrhain
02-18-2008 5:29 AM


Re: apologies
Doh,
silly me - solute/solvent...
Ok,
so if we took 1800 tons of sugar,
disolved it in 18000 tons of water
(assuming roughly 10 to 1 water-to-sugar)
then did a X30 dilution,
we would end up with 18000 tons of water with ONE sugar molecule in it (I still seem to have slipped a decimal place somewhere - oh well.)
Anyway -
you didn't, like, think I was actually supporting this nonsense did you?
I was just trying to get a rough idea of just HOW stupid it all is :-)
Iasion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by Rrhain, posted 02-18-2008 5:29 AM Rrhain has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024