Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is logical support of theism possible?
lfen
Member (Idle past 4706 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 42 of 85 (165460)
12-05-2004 6:10 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Phat
10-21-2004 3:55 PM


Re: The power of prayer
I have often been ridiculed for using the argument of changed lives and persons as evidence of the possibility of God.
Phat,
Your evidence could also used to demonstrate the efficacy of belief particularly as these kinds of miracles occur in a variety of belief systems.
There are also a number of different views on what the word God refers to and some of those systems don't see God as a separate agent designing and then manipulating a creation.
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Phat, posted 10-21-2004 3:55 PM Phat has not replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4706 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 43 of 85 (165469)
12-05-2004 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by mike the wiz
10-20-2004 10:07 PM


Mike,
Part of what you talk about I experience as the rich diversity of the universe. I have thought that that anything exists is quite amazing. Had the universe consisted of a great lump of homogenous matter that did nothing it would still be an incredible miracle, but that it exists with such potentials as we have seen from particles up to galaxies and life on earth does boggle my mind.
My tendency is to believe that consciousness in some fundamental way that I can't grasp is the source of this. I however am very dubious about your arguments about purpose. Purpose is something we humans ascribe, assign, or even invent to explain our behaviours and the behaviours of sub systems.
That a system functions doesn't necessarily mean it has a purpose. It could be put to any number of purposes I suppose. Someone designs a gun to eject a lump of lead over a distance to wound or kill an animal or another human. That was that designers purpose. Let's say I need to hammer a nail in and lack a hammer. My purpose is to affix a sign to a tree. I use the butt of my rifle to whack the nail in. I could have used a rock I found lying on the ground. The rifle was designed, the rock wasn't. In both cases I supplied the purpose, in one case it was the designed purpose and in the second case there was no design of the rock at all.
Purpose is what humans create. Design is what humans do. Why would we ascribe this to the source of the universe?
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by mike the wiz, posted 10-20-2004 10:07 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by mike the wiz, posted 12-05-2004 8:07 PM lfen has replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4706 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 45 of 85 (165505)
12-05-2004 9:24 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by mike the wiz
12-05-2004 8:07 PM


However, I meant specifically, purpose in systems. For example, blood is pumped around the body. Why? The purpose in this example, is that it is there - to be pumped around the body - rather than pumping it out onto the floor, which would have no purpose.
You are describing one of the functions of blood. You can assign a purpose to a function. I could say that the designer created blood so the mosquitos could drink some to lay viable eggs to make more mosquitoes. That is the function for mosquitos anyway and thus could be said to be the purpose that God intended blood for. Thus humans are God's blood cows for his mosquitos!
I'm all for studing systems and system thinking and analysis. I think you are going astray here with your ideas about purpose. Purpose relates to what humans take to be their intentions.
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by mike the wiz, posted 12-05-2004 8:07 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4706 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 48 of 85 (165519)
12-05-2004 10:39 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by mike the wiz
10-26-2004 12:17 PM


Re: Circular Mike, circular
No, I said that the (A)universe is a (B)system.
I think we could agree on what the universe is. I agree that the universe is a system but I think we probably hold very different ideas of what a system is. I mean merely that it is something with parts that interact. I don't think it has to have a purpose to qualify as a system.
I then have a premise that (B)sytems are (C)consciously made
What is consciously? and what is made? This is not evident to me. I think system can happen unconsciously, that is I don't think ants or bees or termites consciously create ant hills, beehives, etc.
I actually suspect consciousness is the source of the universe. I don't think this could ever be proved because if it is the source then it is beyond the relativeness and discrimination and thus ordinary dichotomies of true/false, good/bad, etc can't apply to it, and hence we can't say anything about it that is true.
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by mike the wiz, posted 10-26-2004 12:17 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4706 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 56 of 85 (165688)
12-06-2004 3:30 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by mike the wiz
12-06-2004 7:55 AM


Re: Purpose
Good point. Infact - only when we have consciousness - can systems be made.
Okies, keeping this tightly focused I'll ask one specific question about one system found on earth.
Are honey bees conscious? A bee colony and hive appear to me to be a functioning complex system that does quite a number of things.
I btw don't have a problem with a definition of consciousness that includes insects but it will have to be distinguished from the self consciousness of homo sapiens.
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by mike the wiz, posted 12-06-2004 7:55 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by sidelined, posted 12-06-2004 4:54 PM lfen has not replied
 Message 58 by mike the wiz, posted 12-06-2004 5:01 PM lfen has replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4706 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 68 of 85 (165780)
12-06-2004 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by mike the wiz
12-06-2004 5:01 PM


Re: Purpose
One thing though, are the bees completely responsible, or are they themselves endowed with instinct to be able to do this?
Endowed?
You could guess I would answer they evolved the behaviours.
What about the organization that plaque bacteria arrive at on teeth after about 24 hours with channels and such to maximize their survival?
What is consciousness?
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by mike the wiz, posted 12-06-2004 5:01 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024