Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is logical support of theism possible?
AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 85 (151452)
10-20-2004 9:22 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by mikehager
10-20-2004 3:11 PM


Mike
To make is easier to read can you highlight the parts you're quoting.
Example:
"Logic is rational thinking, and science is a method for discovering things about the natural world. Science cannot lead to believing in a supernatural entity, but logical examination of non-scientific evidence can. Non-scientific evidence can range from psuedo-scientific evidence (evidence based in part on science, but unable to be examined completely by pure science) to evidence based heavily on logic (i.e. textual criticism of the Bible).
In summary, in my opinion, science cannot directly support creation, but there are rational arguments to support creation, and blind faith is not needed."
To see how I did that, click on the raw text button at the bottom.
If approved, where do you want this placed?

How pierceful grows the hazy yon! How myrtle petaled thou! For spring hath sprung the cyclotron How high browse thou, brown cow? -- Churchy LaFemme, 1950

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mikehager, posted 10-20-2004 3:11 PM mikehager has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024