Questions Creationists Never Answer-still waiting!

TC: I know you are hermetically sealed and impervious to any natural explanation for abiogenesis, however, I thought you might find the following articles interesting anyway. They represent some of the current research and evidence for life from non-life. Enjoy your reading! NASA’s origins of life site
RNA and the origins of life
University of Glasgow’s origins of life site
The emergence of living systems in Archaean submarine hot springs

​

[This message has been edited by Quetzal, 01-31-2002]

Retrocrono: Let me get this straight. From your own statements:1. You are in secondary school. Correct?
2. You know little about biology or evolution, principally because you don't have the time. Correct?
3. You (apparently) do not know enough about geology, plate tectonics, physics, etc, to construct a flood model of your own. Correct?If the answers to the above questions are "yes", I'm curious as to how you feel you are able to dismiss 200 years worth of scientific study in geology and 150 years worth of scientific study in biology. You're quite free to believe as you wish, of course, but your rather forceful assertions that the people who have spent lifetimes studying these issues are totally wrong is interesting.

quote:

---

You have made assertions about me that I've done nothing for you to make such claims. Evolution isn't biology, biology is biology. Please, give me a break.

---

Actually, you just made an assertion that reinforces my contention. I'd love to see the biology textbook that shows biology doesn't depend and rely on an evolutionary foundation. How does your textbook explain diversity, genetics, population ecology, speciation, taxonomy/classification etc?