Have any Biblical literalists been to the American Southwest?

Faith writes:How do you explain the neat layering of the overlying strata from the bottom unconformity all the way up to the Kaibab, following the hump and the slope to the north and yet maintaining that parallel layering as it did, if the uplift that caused the hump and probably the unconformity at the base as well, did not occur AFTER the entire stack was complete? I mean, there's no way neat parallel layers of loose sediments are going to lay themselves down over a big hump and a steep slope like that. They would wind up in a heap at the lowest part of the slope. That didn't happen. I can't imagine that geologists think anything different but then don't they have to agree that the uplifting force occurred after the strata were laid down? And isn't that a likely cause of the tilting of the uncomformity at the bottom too? Clearly they were laid down as fairly even horizontal deposits and THEN the upthrust from below pushed them into the hump-and-slope configuration. And it seems to me that same force would have created the uncomformities at the bottom at the same time. Sorry I know I keep repeating myself but I've had the experience so often here of saying something that seems obvious to me but others misread that I feel it's necessary.