This exact same issue was brought up weeks ago.
There comes a time when it is appropriate to stop going over the same ground and stick with the conclusion until new information has been introduced.
It is now about 2 centuries ago that early geologists looked at all the available data and concluded solidly that a big, once-over, world-wide flood could not have happened. Since then all the data continues to support that conclusion.
Nothing, I repeat, NOTHING new has been introduced. Every single argument that you have brought forward is old, not based on a real knowledge of the facts and has been examined at some time before, many decades ago. It is not closed minded to point out to you that you know little of the subject and have arguments that are decades and centuries buried. If there are more productive lines of research engage in that is where the effort is spent. When YEC's have a body of knowledge of any kind they can bring it to bear on the question and then will get the attention of geologists. However, the kind of nonsense that is promulgated by them means it will take some heavy duty convincing before they are listened to. Remember the boy who cried wolf?
The moon is not made of green cheese. My mind is rock hard rigid on that. It is closed minded. Any discussion to the contrary is beneath me.
This message has been edited by NosyNed, 09-08-2005 11:26 PM
™ Version 4.2
