Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Undermining long-held paradigms
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 107 of 124 (346667)
09-05-2006 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Hyroglyphx
09-05-2006 11:55 AM


Paradigms isn't 20 cents
The theory of gravity is a paradigm as defined earlier.
If I don't know exactly where a base ball will land when homered it has no effect on the paradigm involved. If it never lands I have a problem with the paradigm and need to consider if there are additional things that need to be considered -- in this case that might be the relative density of air and the ball.
Evolutionary models tell us that mammals today had ancestors at the time of the dinosaurs. What size they were does not enter into the paradigm. It simply has no effect on evolutionary theory.
If we had NO trace of possible mammalian ancestors from times before the Cenozoic that would be an area of somewhat focussed research since it would be hard (impossible) to explain with the current paradigm. But even then there are other things that might be considered -- though I'm hard pressed to think of any(a hint of a paradigm changing fact).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-05-2006 11:55 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by PaulK, posted 09-05-2006 1:17 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024