Creationist websites such as Answers in Genesis are claiming that there is far too little helium in the atmosphere for the earth to be billions of years old. There argument is something like this:
Helium is produced by the decay of Uranium. It escapes from rocks fairly rapidly and enters the atmosphere. They agree that since helium is a very light gas, some Helium does escape into space, but there is still far more helium being added to the atmoshpere than escaping into space. Thus, because there is so little helium in the atmosphere, the earth cannot be very old.
(I am not very familiar with this subject, so can someone explain to me the flaws, if there are any, with this argument?
However, I have seen evolutionists use a similar kind of argument
against a young earth. The evolutionist argument is something like this: There is a lot more radioactive uranium in the world than radioactive potassium. I believe the ratio of radioactive potassium to radioactive uranium in the planet is something like 27/100 (?). Helium, as the creationists have admitted, diffuses from rocks much more rapidly than argon. Thus, if the earth is young, there should be much, much more helium in the atmosphere than argon because, as stated above, helium defuses faster than argon and much more helium gets produced than argon. Unfortunately for the creationists, there is about 2000 times
more argon in the atmosphere than helium!!! How can this be if the earth is so young?
[This message has been edited by EvO-DuDe, 07-27-2002]