Grasse's comments, ... 1978, well after the origin of the modern synthesis.
I was not talking about Grasse.
Goldschmidt, another evolutionist that disagreed with NeoDarwinian mechanisms ...
Goldschmidt is the (1940) author of the phrase "
hopeful monster" and thus his major work predates the synthesis. His hypothesis is interesting - see Gould's comments (it doesn't necessarily violate any basic element of evolution) - it comes down to a question of what you define as big change:
quote:
... Steven M. Stanley, like Gould, suggests that some of Goldschmidt's views, while apparently extreme, deviate little more from the neo-Darwinian synthesis than the current punctuational model and seem to err mainly in exaggerating the importance of "chromosomal rearrangements" leading to "rapid changes in growth gradients or developmental sequences, and on what we now call quantum speciation."
What is "rapid change" - and how does it occur - are the real questions eh?
Don't you have any
modern references?
Enjoy.
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •