|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,576 Year: 2,833/9,624 Month: 678/1,588 Week: 84/229 Day: 56/28 Hour: 2/10 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: God says this, and God says that | |||||||||||||||||||||||
forgiven Inactive Member |
hello chavalon
Originally posted by Chavalon: The mutually exclusive truth claims made by strong adherents of all the religions mentioned do seem to throw severe doubt on the universal validity of any of them. i frankly don't see how two or more mutually exclusive truth claims can lead to the conclusion that doubt, severe or otherwise, need be thrown on any one of them... person P thinks the earth is spherical in shape, person Q says flat, person R says triangular...
Most pragmatic empiricists do not see profit in ideas of the transcendent, especially in sorting through claim and counter-claim, and may be called atheists, as much for a lack of interest as a lack of capacity for the subject. Suppose a buddhist were to claim that the concept of God is a benign and useful way of conceptualising the thoughts and feelings which arise if one sees merit in entertaining such ideas. Buddhists can and do describe themselves as pragmatic, empirical, religious and atheistic. i agree that empiricists believe as you say, i just think they must borrow from my worldview in order to hold to their beliefs how do buddhists reconcile the seemingly mutually exclusive definitions you attach to their beliefs? for example, would a religious empiricist deny or affirm the supernatural? would a pragmatic atheist, during her religious ceremonies, affirm or deny a deity?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Davies Inactive Member |
let's not get ahead of ourselves here.
quote: That's it. I don't believe in any god or gods. There may very well be a god or gods and they or it may no longer exist. quote: I don't see how you can and I'm not being nasty here. I don't know what is out there if anything. If there is a god or gods, we are not its or their crowning acheivement, it may be unaware or unintelligent. It may not be the only one and it could be as petty as we are, only worse as it's more powerful. ------------------When all else fails, check the manual
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
forgiven Inactive Member |
quote: but mr. davies, my question concerned your words on the subject... here they are:
forgiven: this post and your previous might lead one to believe that while you don't deny God's existence you would need more before you could decide *which* God exists, the muslim, hindu, christian God... is this in fact your position? Mr. DaviesIn a nutshell, yes i'll take your last answer as being your final one, you don't believe in any god
quote: more powerful in its unintelligent way? i think before you decide to argue against the existence of God you might need to have some idea of what the word 'god' means to you...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Davies Inactive Member |
I see my mistake. I will be more careful with you in phrasing my words more carefully and not posting when it's late at night.
I don't believe in any god yet I am convinced there is no god or gods. There is no evidence one way or the other. There could also be more than one god, dead gods, gods coming into being and more than any of us could imagine. They only thing we can do is show that current figures of gods described in books may or may not exist as they are defined in those books. However, I saw an interesting twist on words here:
quote: That's not what I said. I said that any god or gods could be unaware of our existance juat as we unaware of dust mites that live all around us. Also, just because something is powerful does not mean it is intelligent. Crocs are powerful yet I would not call them smart. One thing I will say is that I doubt we are its or their crowning acheivement instead of the absolute that we are not.
quote: Thanks for the concern, but no thanks. Your point is not valid. I have a several ideas of god and gods, from one I was brought up to fear or else I'd go to hell, pantheons of gods, and even dead gods. What I can argue against is the existance of what you feel your god is quite easily using the bible as a starting point. A serious problem that you have is there is nothing to show that your god is any more real than say Marduk of the Sumarians or Oden of the Norse. ------------------When all else fails, check the manual
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
forgiven Inactive Member |
hello mr. davies
quote: a strange paragraph... it seems vaguely redundant to say you don't believe in any god while at the same time being convinced no god exists... how can you accept the possibility of "more than one god, dead gods, gods coming into being and more than any of us could imagine" while at the same time being "convinced there is no god or gods?" i am as confused as you seem to be
quote: do your presuppositions prevent you from examinging my evidence? if not, what sort of evidence would you require, what would be acceptable to you?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Gzus Inactive Member |
quote: Well, to be truthful, I neither believe nor do not believe, I abstain. I neither have nor do not have a God and my definition of God is undefined. Everything is both rational and irrational, for who can say that either is more ‘true’? I abstain from belief or non-belief and who has the right to punish me for my indecision? This is a question which cannot be denied. I cannot say that there is no dogma in this statement for the statement ‘I cannot say that there is no dogma in this statement’ is a ‘choice’ and therefore a violation of my abstention. In saying ‘I abstain’, I have violated my abstention, and yet by not stating my abstention, I have denied my indecision. The question is, how am I justified in making any choice whatsoever? And yet everything that I say or do or think is a violation of my abstention which in turn is a violation of itself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
forgiven Inactive Member |
quote: only if your worldview is ruled by inconsistencies... it's not a matter of who can say one thing or the other, it's a matter of who is able to account for being able to make internally consistent statements
quote:anyone who can point out the irrationality of your statements has that right... if you don't wish your worldview to be judged, don't put it in opposition to another's quote: then why do you pretend to take part in rational discussions if you admit to irrationality in your own thinking? why not look for the weaknesses of your paradigm and throw away the parts that are obviously irrational?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Gzus Inactive Member |
The problem is, that it’s a paradox. By claiming, ‘nothing is certain’, you are also saying that the statement ‘nothing is certain’ is uncertain, and yet how can you come to any other conclusion?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Gzus Inactive Member |
The reason why we are not justified in making any decision can be summarised by a simple discussion
1: What do you see?2: I see an apple on the table 1: How do you know that your senses aren’t fooling you? 2: Well, I don’t 1: how do you know you aren’t mad? 2: I don’t 1: how do you know anything? 2: I don’t. 1: then how are you justified in saying there’s an apple on the table 2: I suppose I’m not, but how are you justified in questioning me? 1: I’m not 2: how are we justified in saying anything? 1: we’re not 2: and yet how are we justified in saying that we are not justified in saying anything? 1: we’re not 2: and yet how are we justified in saying ‘how are we justified in saying that we are not justified in saying anything?’ 1: we’re not 2: and yet how are we justified in saying ‘how are we justified in saying that we are not justified in saying that we are not justified in saying anything?’ 1: how are we justified in saying ‘we’re not’? 2: we’re not etc.. x n and yet how are we justified in denying this paradox?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
forgiven Inactive Member |
quote: that's the whole point... see, i don't have that problem... i trust my senses, i trust my reasoning abilities (such as they are), i know there's more to life than the material world... i have a worldview that allows me to make sense of such things... you don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Gzus Inactive Member |
How are you justified in saying ‘that's the whole point... see, i don't have that problem... i trust my senses, i trust my reasoning abilities (such as they are), i know there's more to life than the material world... i have a worldview that allows me to make sense of such things... you don't’
And If you come up with an answer to that one, then how are you justified in saying that? And if you come up with an answer to that, then how are you justified in saying that? And etc. You can never win [This message has been edited by Gzus, 12-27-2002]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
forgiven Inactive Member |
quote: huh? one of us is very confused... aren't *you* the nihilist?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
forgiven Inactive Member |
quote: you keep missing the point... it isn't enough for you to make the statement, *argue* it... make your case, but do so without relying on tools your worldview does't give you... at least stand up and admit it your worldview is irrational, but don't use reason to argue!! don't use logic!!... those don't exist, can't exist, in your world... at least admit you're nothing but atoms reacting to other atoms and nothing more [This message has been edited by forgiven, 12-27-2002]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Davies Inactive Member |
Crud:
This is what it is supposed to say: I don't believe in any god yet I am NOT convinced there is no god or gods. There is no evidence one way or the other. There could also be more than one god, dead gods, gods coming into being and even more UNUSUAL BEINGS than any of us could imagine. Sorry, not enough Java. As for evidence that your God exists? Oh, a simple "Hi, watch me pull another Universe out of a black hole" would suffice. Yes, that was in jest but why I don't believe in any god is I haven't seen the need for one. As for Presumptions, yours is that your God exists and there is nothing that could disuade you from thinking otherwise, at least for now. One question, are you a biblical literalist? You know, 6 day creation, Noah's flood, that type of stuff. ------------------When all else fails, check the manual
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Davies Inactive Member |
quote: Ah, I see what you are doing. When you find that your God is under attack, change the playing field. If a person's an atheist, tell them that to deny the "supernatural god" you want them to acknowledge is the same as denying reality. Make sure that you place all of the tools that humanity has off limits while doing so. You then claim that these tools are the very same thing that comes from god, your God in this particular case, so you can hamstring them and make them waste time chasing red herrings while we go around trying to define the meaning of what "Is" is. How you get that one can't use logic, a purely human invention, plain silly. Where did it come from? I'd say chemical interactions in the brian. Why does it do those things? Well, I don't know and I don't think anybody does, yet. The "ghost in the machine" is what you hold on to to make your point. Logic is usuable as we know it comes from humans. We can define it. We may not know where exactly it comes from inside of us is at the moment immaterial. If we listen to the likes of you, we will forever be stuck in the cave, afraid to venture outside fearing what we don't know and taking great pains not to find out. As for "being only atoms reacting to other atoms" is a misnomer. While I am, as are you, comprised of atoms, actually very complex compounds that I can't pronounce, does not make me anything less. I am still the father to my children, still a husband to my wife, still another wage slave to my employeer, still a son to my parents, and so on. The problem is you can't see your life as anything but meaningless without your God. I can find meaning even without a god. ------------------When all else fails, check the manual
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024