A common argument against evolution, and for that matter quite a bit of science, is that science removes God from the equation. Unfortunately, I don't have any links or whatnot, but it's one that has been known to be used.
A corollary, then, is that if God has no purpose, why does he exist? The reason this is a logical corollary concerns God's purposes. Everything that exists, even events, supposedly, have a purpose (especially with the religious worldview). If something has no purpose, why would it exist?
My question here, is are creationists (those that make such arguments) afraid of removing all purposes for God, or afraid of believing in something that has no purpose?
My take on it is that for those who believe, it only makes sense to believe in an entity that has a purpose. So we need God to have a purpose, which does not necessarily mean that God does have a purpose, only that we ascribe him one to make his existence more palatable.
Want to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC
Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.