Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,878 Year: 4,135/9,624 Month: 1,006/974 Week: 333/286 Day: 54/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Slavery
monkeysfighting
Inactive Member


Message 91 of 158 (233614)
08-16-2005 7:03 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by riVeRraT
08-16-2005 5:54 AM


Re: TIme machine
quote:
The slaves were taken care of, there was no need to steal food for himself or others.
You could say they were taken care of but only in the most basic sense. The were not taken care of like a parent would take care of their own child. It was care enough to keep them alive so that they could work.
quote:
So I guess you are saying that you would forgive the slave and then starve to death? Remember this is the OT.
I wouldnt have had a slave in the first part. It was not impossible to survive back then without slaves
quote:
I suppose he could have just got a job on wall st. to off set the money he loses when the crops don't yield anything.
no but he probably could have survived without slaves.
quote:
How did wealthy people become wealthy?
Some get lucky, some work hard and some exploit people
quote:
Well now your taking things out of context. I am not taking about unjustified punishment, but somehow our narrow-minded view of slavery (also our justifiably horrible view of new world slavery), let's you think that all punishments would be unjustified, and cruel
The bible (Exodus 21:20) contains no mention of the beating being justified. It literally justifies an unjustified beating. Sure some beatings would be justified but not all would be.
quote:
So your basic human nature would lead to someone receiving a beating? How barbaric of you.
No it is my legal system (based on christain values) that would lead to the punishment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 5:54 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 9:38 AM monkeysfighting has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 640 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 92 of 158 (233623)
08-16-2005 8:23 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by riVeRraT
08-15-2005 7:55 PM


Re: TIme machine
Is the moral absolute 'love'?
If so,then two people who are the same gender who love each other is acceptable to you. If not, then, love is relative.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by riVeRraT, posted 08-15-2005 7:55 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 9:47 AM ramoss has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 93 of 158 (233627)
08-16-2005 9:06 AM
Reply to: Message 79 by riVeRraT
08-15-2005 7:39 PM


Re: Morals
quote:
I don't know how you want to break down the moral code.
The Bible is pretty clear in Leviticus regarding the moral code. There is a long list of very specific rules and clear indications of what are abominations and what are not.
I mean, isn't it true that you consider homosexuality immoral because of what it says in Leviticus and elsewhere in the Bible?
The Bible is just as clear regarding the moral rightness of slavery as it is regarding the moral wrongness of homosexuality, so what I can't figure out is why you are so inconsistent with what rules and moral instructions you will and won't follow from the Bible.
It seems arbitrary, or influenced much more by the manmade culture we live in than anything else.
quote:
But the root of God's moral code for us is love. How all those rules relate to God loving us is what I can't figure out.
Right. What a very confusing moral code the Bible sets out for us when viewed in total.
quote:
But instead of trying to prove that those rules don't add up to love, I would rather spend my efforts on figuring out how they would add up to love, because if God exists, then he loves us.
You say that you use the Bible to learn the character of God and to understand what God wants us to do, right?
If the Bible seems to show God in a good, loving light, you accept that easily, but if the Bible shows God in a bloodthirsty, vengeful, or cruel light, you don't accept that, even though the Bible is supposed to be your source of information about the nature of God.
How can you argue with the Bible when it is supposed to show you the character of God?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by riVeRraT, posted 08-15-2005 7:39 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 10:04 AM nator has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 444 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 94 of 158 (233632)
08-16-2005 9:38 AM
Reply to: Message 91 by monkeysfighting
08-16-2005 7:03 AM


Re: TIme machine
You could say they were taken care of but only in the most basic sense. The were not taken care of like a parent would take care of their own child. It was care enough to keep them alive so that they could work.
You know, you were there?
I wouldnt have had a slave in the first part. It was not impossible to survive back then without slaves
Your assuming you would know then, what you know now. The fictional story is based on you having slaves. I think once you find out that there are meanings of the word slave besides what is in the dictionary, and what we know about the cruel new world slavery, you might change your mind.
Do you believe in adoption?
no but he probably could have survived without slaves.
It depends where he lives, and how much land he has, and how capable he was.
Some get lucky, some work hard and some exploit people
Not too much has changed in the world, huh?
The bible (Exodus 21:20) contains no mention of the beating being justified. It literally justifies an unjustified beating. Sure some beatings would be justified but not all would be.
Your right. People are mean. But not everyone.
How could you believe in God, and say your following him, and then give unjustified beatings to people.
People proclaim with their mouths that they follow God, and do this or that for God, but no one knows what is really in their hearts. This is why I have chosen not to let the actions of others determine if God exists or not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by monkeysfighting, posted 08-16-2005 7:03 AM monkeysfighting has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 444 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 95 of 158 (233634)
08-16-2005 9:47 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by ramoss
08-16-2005 8:23 AM


Re: TIme machine
Yes, it is acceptable to me. I do not judge them. Let's not start a gay thread please.
But this brings up a point of the do's and don't's of the bible. I don't think that you can find God, by doing the do's and don't's of the bible. You find him through love. If you truely love God, then the do's and don't's will come naturally. I have witnessed this in my life, and many other peoples lives, including gay people.
What I want to know is how slavery fits into all this. That is why we are hashing this out.
I found a web-site that tries to explain it. I am only about 1/3 of the way through, but it is interesting, because it matches what I felt already, and I have no education in ancient slavery. I think everyone involved in this thread should check it out.
http://www.christian-thinktank.com/qnoslave.html
Of course this is from a christian point of view. I've read liberal points of view on the internet, but all they can seem to focus on is new world slavery. Which I do not feel is a Godly thing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by ramoss, posted 08-16-2005 8:23 AM ramoss has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 444 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 96 of 158 (233637)
08-16-2005 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by nator
08-16-2005 9:06 AM


Re: Morals
I mean, isn't it true that you consider homosexuality immoral because of what it says in Leviticus and elsewhere in the Bible?
Not entirely. I felt it was wrong before I was ever even close to being a Chrsitian. Even though I was raised by liberal parents. But that is my own personal feeling, and what Jesus taught us was to not pass judgement. So it's ok if a person wants to be gay IMO.
The Bible is just as clear regarding the moral rightness of slavery as it is regarding the moral wrongness of homosexuality, so what I can't figure out is why you are so inconsistent with what rules and moral instructions you will and won't follow from the Bible.
Neither am I. I follow the NT mostly. I am a new Christian relativly speaking. What I rely on is the Holy Spirit, and the wisdom I recieve from him. Please go read this link:
http://www.christian-thinktank.com/qnoslave.html
It gives some explanation of slavery more along the lines of what I was speculating about. How accurate this is, I don't know, it is a Chrsitian point of view. My speculation was based on what I was feeling from the Holy Spirit. It is still not clear to me, and the question remains even for myself, why would a loving God condon slavery?
But the bible did not start the insitution of slavery either, nor does it actually come out and command you to have slaves.
Remember how God wanted us to live? In the garden.
Hid holiness and love in uncomprehendable to us, and we must need to experience all the bad things, before we can start to grasp it.
Remember he created evil too, but its up to you which one you choose.
The bible explains that God protects a righteous man, but I suspect ther aren't many in the world. I do not consider myself fully righteous, and lacking in God's eyes. But I still feel his love for me.
It seems arbitrary, or influenced much more by the manmade culture we live in than anything else.
Yes, I agree.
You say that you use the Bible to learn the character of God and to understand what God wants us to do, right?
If the Bible seems to show God in a good, loving light, you accept that easily, but if the Bible shows God in a bloodthirsty, vengeful, or cruel light, you don't accept that, even though the Bible is supposed to be your source of information about the nature of God.
How can you argue with the Bible when it is supposed to show you the character of God?
I accept the loving light, because I am a loving person. Maybe a meaner person than me won't accept that part as easy. we are all molded by our experiences in life. But the truth is built into our cores, and one if day you can find it, that's great. I believe the word of God exists in the bible, yes, but I found God through studying the NT, not the OT. I never did understand the part about slavery. The web-site I gave you the link too, gives somewhat of a reasonable explanation.
It talks about slavery actually being from man, not God, and that man would not a accept no slavery concept.bBut the gospel was very radical to begin with, why not say no slavery as well.
I find many verses in the NT of what Jesus spoke, that would condradict slavery. Maybe he left it to us to figure out?
Read the artical, it's pretty good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by nator, posted 08-16-2005 9:06 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by nator, posted 08-16-2005 10:47 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 97 of 158 (233638)
08-16-2005 10:05 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by riVeRraT
08-15-2005 7:52 PM


Re: TIme machine
It is the behavior of a warlike people who believes that their murder, rape, and pillage, including the taking of slaves, is directly sanctioned by their God.
quote:
As far as the wars in the bible directly, maybe the people they were fighting were a lot worse than them, and needed to be straightened out.
I don't know, or pretend to know.
To casually decide that maybe an entire society deserved to be murdered, the women raped and the children taken as slaves is truly disgusting.
How can you possibly condone the buying and selling of human beings, at any time or place?
quote:
When it's not against a persons will, otherwise I do not understand why.
Do you believe that everyone has basic human rights, riverrat?
Yes or no?
There are destitute people all over the world. Maybe we should make slavery legal again so those of us in rich nations could buy them up.
quote:
You really haven't been reading what I am saying, and you are trying to make me out to be a monster.
Did you or did you not write the following:
Message #9 in this thread
quote:
We also have no clue as to the intelligence of the slaves back then, maybe they couldn't even exist without the help of being a slave. Maybe even some people were perfectly content being a slave, who knows? It doesn't sound good to us now, since we have the ability to self sustain ourselves.
Your argument follows quite logically that from a purely economic perspective we should allow slavery again, because there are probably more destitute people in the world now than 2000 years ago.
Shouldn't those with the ability to sustain ourselves enslave those who do not? Maybe the reason people can't feed and clothe themselves today is because they aren't as intelligent as we are. And if we're really nice to them, they would probably be much happier.
Isn't this your argument?
If God told you to sell your children into slavery to the highest bidder, would you obey?
quote:
Of course not today.
So, you would have sold your children into slavery sometime in the past?
Would you question the morality of that command?
Or would you just shrug your shoulders and say, "Who am I to question God?"
quote:
Who was it that was going to kill his son because God told him too, but at the last second an angel appeared and made him stop.
My faith isn't that deep, I wouldn't pass that test. Does that mean there is no God now?
Thank you for your honesty.
Now you have considered what it would mean to sell your own children into slavery, and have admitted that you would defy even God Himself if He commanded you to do so.
It wouldn't matter how well your children were treated as slaves, you wouldn't ever want them to be enslaved, right?
Slavery doesn't sound so harmless now that you are thinking about your own children, does it?
So maybe now you can understand my disgust at your repeated suggestions that slavery might not have been such a terrible thing.
Do you believe that people can and often do make rash descisions when they are in emotionally charged, desperate, life-threatening situations?
You cannot accept Jesus into your heart, unless you really mean it. You can say what you want on the outside.
How do you tell the difference?
I have no problem with you evangelizing to people when they are healthy, happy, and in a stable environment.
That way, you can be assured that they are making a thoughtful, reasoned choice, right?
quote:
It just happened last week. My church went to MExico, to help build part of a house for some people. When they got there, some other local workers were hired to help, and the workers did not like us at first. When we showed them love, in 3 days, 6 workers gave themselves to the Lord. We were not giving those workers anything, they were not depended on us, we were just working alongside them.
But you were giving them something.
You were helping them build a house.
It's not like you just went door to door.
quote:
That's the power of love, and God.
And free labor, and effective sales technique.
There is BOTH real, literal slavery in which people are bought and sold, AND the type of figurative "slavery" to employers, spouses, fashion trends, etc.
You were the one, let's remember, who brought up your emloyee who had trouble with a previous employer during a conversation about actual, literal, people-owning-people human bondage as an example of "human slavery".
quote:
Although I have expressed the point I was trying to make several times to you, you still are hung up on the definition of slavery, why is that?
Because you kept using an example of figurative slavery (your employee's problems with a bad employer) to illustrate your argument defending the Bible's condoning and encouragement of literal slavery (people buying and selling other people).
You kept using the two definitions interchangeably, over and over, so I just want it to be very clear that they are not at all the same.
How does your employee's situation with his former employer relate at all to the rules about slavery in the Bible, anyway?
Does the bible make reference to corporate insurance and liability regarding employee injury claims?
quote:
Your so determined to go against what I say?
Only when you are wrong and need to be corrected.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by riVeRraT, posted 08-15-2005 7:52 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 10:26 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 98 of 158 (233643)
08-16-2005 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by riVeRraT
08-15-2005 7:55 PM


Re: TIme machine
quote:
The moral absolute is love.
Its definment is relative to our times.
"Moral absolutes" are behaviors or rules, not abstract concepts such as "love".
"Murder always is morally wrong" is a moral absolute, for example.
Is it your contention that humans define morality?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by riVeRraT, posted 08-15-2005 7:55 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 10:37 AM nator has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 444 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 99 of 158 (233646)
08-16-2005 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by nator
08-16-2005 10:05 AM


Re: TIme machine
To casually decide that maybe an entire society deserved to be murdered, the women raped and the children taken as slaves is truly disgusting.
In today's world, yes. I don't know how I would feel about it, if I got into that time machine and was transported back there.
Do you believe that everyone has basic human rights, riverrat?
Yes or no?
Yes, a person has the right to give himself as a slave to someone else. Also if 2 people believe in slavery, and one gives his child to the other for monetary gains, and the child accepts it as a part of life, and knows this is the only way that child will survive, because they can't do it themselves, I believe they have a right to do that.
I do not believe people should be slaves against their will, thats the part I have trouble with, but then again, I am not there 4000 years ago.
Your argument follows quite logically that from a purely economic perspective we should allow slavery again, because there are probably more destitute people in the world now than 2000 years ago.
I am not saying we should allow it now. I am saying it may have been ok for the day.
What ever it is we are doing now isn't working anyway, because to many people suffer.
Shouldn't those with the ability to sustain ourselves enslave those who do not? Maybe the reason people can't feed and clothe themselves today is because they aren't as intelligent as we are. And if we're really nice to them, they would probably be much happier.
Isn't this your argument?
No, thats your ignorant marrow minded take on it.
So, you would have sold your children into slavery sometime in the past?
Only to save their lives, and as long as they could buy their way out at some point.
Now you have considered what it would mean to sell your own children into slavery, and have admitted that you would defy even God Himself if He commanded you to do so.
Yes, I defy God on a daily basis. I am not perfect.
So maybe now you can understand my disgust at your repeated suggestions that slavery might not have been such a terrible thing.
Of course I understand it. What I don't understand is you only basing your opinion on what the world is today.
You cannot accept Jesus into your heart, unless you really mean it. You can say what you want on the outside.
How do you tell the difference?
I can, because there is a genuine change in a person, and the Spirit confirms this. That is how God proves himself to me, by communicating with his Holy Spirit.
quote:It just happened last week. My church went to MExico, to help build part of a house for some people. When they got there, some other local workers were hired to help, and the workers did not like us at first. When we showed them love, in 3 days, 6 workers gave themselves to the Lord. We were not giving those workers anything, they were not depended on us, we were just working alongside them.
But you were giving them something.
You were helping them build a house.
It's not like you just went door to door.
No we weren't giving the workers anything. As a matter of fact most of us that went couldn't even speak spanish, so there was very little communication as well. But somehow love prevailed. Love does not have to be spoken, and when you do things for the glory of God, you carry with you the Spirit of God, and that Spirit can be felt by those around you.
One guy came on the job on the 5th day, and said when he got there, he felt a peace that he never felt before. One of the people from our church who does speak Spanish preached a message to him, and at that moment he felt the Holy Spirit, and gave himself to Jesus. Thats the power of Love, and the power of God.
Because you kept using an example of figurative slavery (your employee's problems with a bad employer) to illustrate your argument defending the Bible's condoning and encouragement of literal slavery (people buying and selling other people).
Ok, so you did miss the point, and even though I explained it to you, I will explain it again.
My point was, that we look at what went on then, even though we don't have all the facts as barbaric. Yes some of it was.
I am saying that 2000 years from now, we will look at our current labor practices as barbaric.
We cannot find God through either of these thoughts.
Only when you are wrong and need to be corrected.
Or when you miss my points

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by nator, posted 08-16-2005 10:05 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by ringo, posted 08-16-2005 1:37 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 444 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 100 of 158 (233647)
08-16-2005 10:37 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by nator
08-16-2005 10:14 AM


Re: TIme machine
quote:
quote:The moral absolute is love.
Its definment is relative to our times.
"Moral absolutes" are behaviors or rules, not abstract concepts such as "love".
"Murder always is morally wrong" is a moral absolute, for example.
Is it your contention that humans define morality?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by nator, posted 08-16-2005 10:14 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 101 of 158 (233648)
08-16-2005 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by riVeRraT
08-16-2005 10:04 AM


Re: Morals
quote:
But the bible did not start the insitution of slavery either, nor does it actually come out and command you to have slaves.
Yes, it does:
Lev 25:45 Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.
25:46 And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever
There is also many mentions in the Biible of God using slavery as a threat or punishment for people, so that kind of blows your notions of slavery being sort of OK back then out of the water, doesn't it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 10:04 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 11:38 AM nator has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 444 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 102 of 158 (233661)
08-16-2005 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by nator
08-16-2005 10:47 AM


Re: Morals
No it doesn't.
It doesn't command you to take a slave, it says it's ok.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by nator, posted 08-16-2005 10:47 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by nator, posted 08-16-2005 12:29 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 103 of 158 (233671)
08-16-2005 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by riVeRraT
08-16-2005 11:38 AM


This is clearly a list of exactly what God wants the Israelites to do when they make war against a neighboring nation.
God intructs them to kill the men and enslave the women and children.
God gave them these things.
Deut 20:12 And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it:
Deut 20:13 And when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword:
Deut 20:14 But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee.
Deut 20:15 Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 11:38 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 4:06 PM nator has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 104 of 158 (233689)
08-16-2005 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by riVeRraT
08-16-2005 10:26 AM


Re: TIme machine
riVeRraT writes:
Also if 2 people believe in slavery, and one gives his child to the other for monetary gains, and the child accepts it as a part of life, and knows this is the only way that child will survive, because they can't do it themselves, I believe they have a right to do that.
This is getting pretty silly.
If your child can't survive without me taking care of her, then I would adopt her, not buy her.
Stop pretending that slavery is somehow a good thing. There is always a better alternative (and a more obvious one).
-------------
You talk a lot about "love", but you're for slavery and against gay marriage?
"By their fruits ye shall know them."

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 10:26 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 4:07 PM ringo has replied

  
Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1268 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 105 of 158 (233699)
08-16-2005 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by riVeRraT
08-16-2005 5:55 AM


Re: Morals
You agree?
Actions based on survival are not actions of love.
Killing "for survival" is still sin.
This message has been edited by Chris Porteus, 08-16-2005 02:18 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 5:55 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by riVeRraT, posted 08-16-2005 4:09 PM Trump won has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024