If you look at your original post you will see that the emphasisied text clearly refers to earthquakes - and the source was written in the year of the San Francisco earthquake. What is more, you claimed that the current situation was even worse.
Prophecy also implicates earthquakes. At least one prophecy you are relying on explicitly mentions earthquakes (Mark 13:8). But it does not mention storms at all.
So where's your case ? Which prophecies explicitly refer to storms ? Why isn't the lack of an increase in earthquakes significant ? What is the evidence that storms are getting worse - on a global scale - than they have been at other points in the last 2000 years ?
I will comment on one thing more. In your reply to berberry you states:
quote:
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT NATURAL DISASTERS WITHIN THE LAST 50-60 YEARS! And no, I have not stated once that we have it worse today.
Yet in your original post you state:
quote:
And believe me, it is a lot worse today then it was in 1906.