Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy ⇒

Scientific errors in the Bible

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scientific errors in the Bible
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 10 of 163 (12810)
07-05-2002 1:51 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by The Arachnophile
05-07-2002 7:27 AM

1. Is 'on all four' a literal translation or a colloquial one? Is it even possible that the ancients use 'on all four' colloquially as we do? Simple Hebrew/Aramaic research will answer the first part.
​
2. The ruminent issue is discussed at www.answersingenesis.org (search for ruminant probably). The point made is that the term 'chew the cud' may have included both classic cud chewing and the fact that rabbits eat their dung.
​
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 07-05-2002]
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by The Arachnophile, posted 05-07-2002 7:27 AM The Arachnophile has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024