Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 2/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy ⇒

Is the Bible acceptable?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is the Bible acceptable?
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 35 of 111 (457955)
02-26-2008 2:40 PM 		Reply to: Message 31 by graft2vine
02-26-2008 1:29 AM

graft2vine writes:
​
Creation is a science just as much as evolution is a science.
​
graft2vine writes:
​
the Bible is just as valid to science in explaining creationism as a scientific theory
​
This is rubbish.
​
Show how creation and the bible is science or retract your woefully foolish assertion.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by graft2vine, posted 02-26-2008 1:29 AM graft2vine has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by graft2vine, posted 02-27-2008 12:07 AM Larni has replied
  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 38 of 111 (458076)
02-27-2008 4:55 AM 		Reply to: Message 36 by graft2vine
02-27-2008 12:07 AM

So you are saying that the bible is acceptable as science because of the concept of 'kinds'?
​
100 virtual if you can define 'kinds' for me in a way that matches observed reality.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by graft2vine, posted 02-27-2008 12:07 AM graft2vine has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by autumnman, posted 02-27-2008 10:35 AM Larni has replied
 Message 40 by graft2vine, posted 02-27-2008 11:31 AM Larni has replied
  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 42 of 111 (458126)
02-27-2008 12:41 PM 		Reply to: Message 39 by autumnman
02-27-2008 10:35 AM

Re: No disbelief; No power of reason
Did you mean to reply specifically to me?
​
If not you can use the General Reply button on the lower left at the end of the thread.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by autumnman, posted 02-27-2008 10:35 AM autumnman has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by graft2vine, posted 02-27-2008 12:53 PM Larni has replied
  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 44 of 111 (458129)
02-27-2008 12:46 PM 		Reply to: Message 40 by graft2vine
02-27-2008 11:31 AM

So you could point to an 'ancesteral gene pool' and say this kind is distinct from that kind?
​
Where for art thou, distinct ancesteral gene pools?
​
So to claim you 100 virtual you need to identify these hypothesised distinct ancesteral gene pools aloowing us to identify kinds in a systematic way.
​
The clock starts now.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by graft2vine, posted 02-27-2008 11:31 AM graft2vine has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by graft2vine, posted 02-27-2008 1:02 PM Larni has replied
  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 59 of 111 (458182)
02-27-2008 4:03 PM 		Reply to: Message 46 by graft2vine
02-27-2008 12:53 PM

Re: No disbelief; No power of reason
Um...I was asking Autumn if he/she was speaking to me.
​
I was replying to another poster, rather than you.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by graft2vine, posted 02-27-2008 12:53 PM graft2vine has not replied
  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 60 of 111 (458183)
02-27-2008 4:04 PM 		Reply to: Message 47 by graft2vine
02-27-2008 1:02 PM

No 100 virtual for you.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by graft2vine, posted 02-27-2008 1:02 PM graft2vine has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by graft2vine, posted 02-27-2008 4:17 PM Larni has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024