Dating The Exodus II

Willowtree This I have to hear.What is the astronomical fixation by which Rutherford's chronology claim depends?

---

Poets say science takes away from the beauty of the stars - mere globs of gas atoms. I too can see the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or more? The vastness of the heavens stretches my imagination - stuck on this carousel my little eye can catch one - million - year - old light. A vast pattern - of which I am a part... What is the pattern, or the meaning, or the why? It does not do harm to the mystery to know a little about it. For far more marvelous is the truth than any artists of the past imagined it. Why do the poets of the present not speak of it? What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent? " Richard Feynman

AdminNosyI am sorry Nosy but why is this evidence by Rutherford mentioned in this thread by Willowtree as though it were pertainent to the arguement? I withdraw any further pursuit of the matter if the point about Rutherford made by Willowtree is explained.Even then if you wish it I will post a new topic in order to adress it.It would help in either case to know just where I might find a reference in Willowtree's posts concerning this.Your humble servant grovels in abject Fear of your wrath.Please forgive my impertenance. Shall I repent with the usual sacrifice or do you require something exotic this time.Perhaps an endangered species Hmm?____________________________
Signature withheld by request

AdminNosy No doubt but let me check with the pondscu..I mean my lawyer.Yes I was but I thought that since Willowtree had brought it forth to bolster this that I could tackle it within the context of how it was presented.My mistake.B,B, or R? Canada Post or courier?