Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Problems with both Creationism and Evolution
Andor
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 69 (12067)
06-24-2002 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by octipice
06-24-2002 12:38 AM


quote:
Microscopic organisms do not reproduce like humans or most other plants and animals. How do you explain the differences in the two means of reproduction?
There are microscopic organisms that have sexual reproduction, just alike larger organisms (for instance Chlamydomonas ).
What is exactly your question, Why and how sexual reproduction started?, Why asexual reproduction is still functioning?
[This message has been edited by Andor, 06-24-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by octipice, posted 06-24-2002 12:38 AM octipice has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by octipice, posted 06-24-2002 9:00 PM Andor has replied

  
Andor
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 69 (12151)
06-25-2002 6:50 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by octipice
06-24-2002 9:00 PM


-The obvious advantage of sexual reproduction is a much faster production of genetic variation. It's then a great improvement when the species confront a rapidly variable environment.
On the other hand when the environment is stable, without changes, asexual reproduction may be advantageous.
There are species (mainly plants), that alternate between both ways of reproduction according to the environment.
-A theory relates sexual reproduction with a better defense against parasites.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by octipice, posted 06-24-2002 9:00 PM octipice has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by octipice, posted 06-26-2002 9:53 PM Andor has replied

  
Andor
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 69 (12278)
06-27-2002 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by octipice
06-26-2002 9:53 PM


I don't know if this topic has been previously discussed in other threads. ?
Probably the origin of recombination was not related with reproduction but as a DNA (or RNA) repair process. This model was proposed by Bernstein and col. (though I'm following Maynard Smith here): In the early Earth, with an atmosphere devoid of oxygen and ozone, haploid organisms would be very vulnerable to damage by UV radiation. It should be a great advantage to have copies of the genes in the cell. The high cost of this would be resolved by a periodically fusion with another cell, originating a dipoloid transitory, which would allow mutual repair.
With the progressive growth of genetic material, also increased the probability of lethal mutations, and the advantages of a duplicated genome, caused that, in time, the diploid state became the dominant one.
This process wasn't instantaneous. Have in mind that recombination probably evolved about 3 billion years ago as a mechanism of DNA repair, while sex evolved about 1-2 billion years ago in the early eukaryotes.
[This message has been edited by Andor, 06-27-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by octipice, posted 06-26-2002 9:53 PM octipice has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by octipice, posted 06-27-2002 11:10 PM Andor has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024