Guys, I'm currently writing an article to debunk Harun Yahya nonsense about the evolution of birds. As I see it, HY got his arguments mainly from quoting Alan Feduccia, opponent of John Ostrom's dino-bird theory, and said that the recently found Four-Wings
Microraptor gui is trouble for the dino-bird theorists.
FYI, I am also skeptic about the dino-bird link. I am in favor of Alan Feduccia's stem reptile-bird theory, as did Larry Martin & Ernst Mayr (as stated in
What evolution is). The problems of the dino-bird theory such as 1,2,3 (dino) vs 2,3,4 (bird) digits, short forelimbs, and impossibility of ground-up flight precursor, convinced me that the Ostrom theory is bunk. And that puts us in a strange position, as if agreeing with the Harun Yahya Co. Given the perfect-transitional morphological and temporal state of
Archaeopteryx, one must be a real close-minded bigot to say that birds did not evolve from reptiles (but not raptors IMO).
I am working on a series of illustrations depicting the change in skeletal morphology from stem reptiles to Archy to Four-Wings to
Ichtyornis to modern domestic chicken. However I ran into trouble in finding the perfect pre-
Archaeopteryx reptile. Chinese
Sinosauropteryx and other seemingly 'primitive' species came from Cretaceous strata while Archy turned up in Jurassic Solnhofen. And nobody has cleared up on the dubious
Protoavis.
Which Triassic/Jurassic species can be considered the beste candidate for the pre-Archy stage? I welcome your suggestions.