Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Proving Evolution in the Age of Genetics
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5901 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 44 of 50 (177233)
01-15-2005 8:58 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by Jazzns
01-14-2005 12:18 PM


Re: Old Style of Proving Evolution
Just to poke my nose in here.
You started of by saying that what constitutes a dog is that it can only mate with other dogs.
This is actually inaccurate (at least as far as dogs go). Fertile hybrids of dogs and other species of canids are relatively common. Dog-wolf, dog-coyote, even dog-fox hybrids are known. The simplified explanation is that the divergence (speciation events) separating the various species were relatively (evolutionarily speaking) recent, and total genetic isolation has not been achieved. Often the F2 generation of these hybrids "breeds back" to the "wild type".
NosyQ

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Jazzns, posted 01-14-2005 12:18 PM Jazzns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Jazzns, posted 01-15-2005 4:24 PM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5901 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 47 of 50 (178099)
01-18-2005 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by RAZD
01-15-2005 4:44 PM


Re: Old Style of Proving Evolution
in this regard every living thing is a ring species in time.
I absolutely adore that phrase. I'd like to use it in an essay I'm working on. Did you invent it or is it something you remember reading somewhere? (I need to know for attribution issues.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by RAZD, posted 01-15-2005 4:44 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by RAZD, posted 01-18-2005 8:26 PM Quetzal has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5901 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 48 of 50 (178101)
01-18-2005 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Jazzns
01-15-2005 4:24 PM


Re: Old Style of Proving Evolution
I know you understand, but I'm not sure your correspondent does, which is the only reason I added to/clarified what you wrote. You're totally correct that this is an example of the continuum of species. This was really Darwin's biggest contribution IMO: the break from typological to population thinking (essentialism vs evolution).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Jazzns, posted 01-15-2005 4:24 PM Jazzns has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024