Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Do computer simulations support cumulative selection?
Mammuthus
Member (Idle past 6504 days)
Posts: 3085
From: Munich, Germany
Joined: 08-09-2002


Message 11 of 12 (16420)
09-02-2002 11:41 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by blitz77
09-02-2002 10:00 AM


You seem to be confusing abiogenesis with evolution...see the Origin of Life thread.
quote:
Originally posted by blitz77:
quote:
Well - nitpicking and cheating, true - but I read the story as indicating a principle, for which simplicity is a benefit. OK, you can make a multivibrator with two transistors, but my first point was that something 'new' had emerged. Creationists argue strongly that micro-evolution - 'improving' a species - is possible, but that a new 'vital' organ cannot be generated, so a 'new' animal cannot be evolved. Here we have a radio receiver where before we had a signal generator.
My second point was not that the design was hard, but that it was done without directed design, by evolution, rather than by intention. This is surely also of relevance to the evolution/creation debate. Evolutionary pressures just made use of the induced AM oscillations you mentioned would be in the environment.
Here you have all the components required-the transistors did not pop up from a morass of metal. This is the evolution of something which uses material already existent. Classifying linking up of transistors in the same class as macroevolution of new organs is quite a leap.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by blitz77, posted 09-02-2002 10:00 AM blitz77 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024