Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Snakes with legs? E or C?
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 12 of 41 (373056)
12-30-2006 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Origen
12-30-2006 1:41 AM


quote:
I plead with you forum members to consider this defense of the Bible. None of you have to die forever!
So can I deduce from this statement that the reason you believe in the Christian God is because you fear death?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Origen, posted 12-30-2006 1:41 AM Origen has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 39 of 41 (373347)
01-01-2007 8:36 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Origen
12-31-2006 10:41 PM


Re: My Snake Has Legs...
quote:
First of all we have to go on knowable facts. This is hard for evolutionists because they are so used to accepting the assumptions from their evolutionary Professors, who trusted the assumtpions of their evolutionary Professors and so on.
See, you are suffering under a major misconception regarding how science works.
Science progresses through a process of replication of results and critical peer-review, not through simply taking past scientist's word for things.
Every single new experiment or finding is a test of previous conclusions.
Your description above is more like the unquestioned and unchallenged passing on of dogma that religions engage in, and let me assure you that this is not the case within science.
Science is very contentious and competitive; the way for a scientist to become very well-known is to make some dramatic finding that, after withstanding replication and critical peer review, shows how wrong his or her predecessors were.
Science progresses and carreers in science are made when previous paradigms are overturned.
That is the complete opposite of your claim.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Origen, posted 12-31-2006 10:41 PM Origen has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 40 of 41 (373348)
01-01-2007 8:46 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Origen
01-01-2007 1:03 AM


quote:
You need to take 10-years of philosophy and learn how to compute data and then we can talk. Its 2007 right now, I'll hopefully see you in 2017 when you learned who to calculate the baby steps of pratical analysis. I'm not good with young people who don't know who to analysis data and find it hard to also help somebody under the influence of the priori-commitment to evolution. I guess our conversation has ended because there is a major problem in analytical methodology. I assumed this website was all masters and scholars already trained in analysis. Sorry I can't help you understand. My mind has problems thinking in terms of confusion that comes from manipulative methodolgy of the humanist manifesto.
LOL!
So, I guess this means that you can't answer arach's question, even though you are so smart and educated?
You can't explain how he is mistaken so we understand?
One would think that someone with the wisdom, intellectual power, and education levels you say you have would be able to do that.
But you'll just say we are all punk rockers in bed with the KGB, I suppose, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Origen, posted 01-01-2007 1:03 AM Origen has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024