I am sorry for supplying a link that contains a photograph from a site that may contain content that is "refuted". Here is the image on its own .
quote:
evolution can interpretate whale fins has hands if they want to
Actually the area that I expected you to consider was more to the rear of the embryo (as seen marked with an
H), the front fins scientists merely conclude to be fins. I am curious why it is so difficult to imagine that a whale cannot have once had legs while you so easily conclude that snakes once did? There are photographs.
quote:
you can see the evidence in Boas and Pythons that they used to have legs in the ancient past
Please show me the evidence that Boas and Pythons did have legs while whales did not. Perhaps your friend has done the research that shows how snakes and whales differ in this regard?
This is not philosophy, science, marxism, satanism, or whatever you want to call it - this is simply observation of a photograph. You state one thing as fact, how does it differ from what I present as fact?