Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Vestiges for Peter B.
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5901 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 36 of 125 (17256)
09-12-2002 9:44 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by nos482
09-10-2002 6:07 PM


quote:
Originally posted by nos482:
Many of the early deities were female. I can understand why you wouldn't want to think that this were possible. You come from a chauvinistic culture.
Hi nos. I agree that there were a lot of female deities - most of the early creation myths we can trace enshrined the female principle as the creator (makes sense, no?). This also translated to agriculture, husbandry, etc. Sumer, the Aztecs, etc, almost invariably used female deities in these roles. However, I would say that you might have a tough case showing correlation between having a bunch of female deities - even creators - and having a matriarchal society. Most of the early "civilizations" (i.e., from which we have something resembling written records - the Mesoamerican cultures, Sumer, Egypt, the pre-Babylonian chariot cultures, etc) all were (as near as we can tell) patriarchal societies.
Do you have any archeological references indicating that there is a correlation between polytheists having some female deities and the type of society?
quote:
Even in the animal kingdom females are mostly in charge. I.E. Insects, many of the big cats, Elephants, etc...
I'm not sure you can state this. Haplodiploid insects like bees and wasps with a strong caste system could, I suppose, be considered "female dominant", in the sense that all of the non-reproductives (i.e., everything except the queen and the male drones) are genetically "female". This doesn't mean that "females are in charge" of anything. Nor are males in this case. As to the big cats, you'll need to provide a reference. The only species that come to mind are lion (in which males compete), and leopards (where you're dealing with single motherhood). Are there any Felidae where the females compete for males (one indicator of female dominance/matriarchy)?
You can make a case that the female investment in reproduction is substantially higher in most sexually reproducing organisms than is the male's. However, whether that equates to "being in charge" is a whole 'nother question.
I'd appreciate any references you could provide on this.
WRT: The antiquity of wicca - I have little knowledge of the subject. Do you have any info or references tending to show a 20,000+ year old religion of any kind? Let alone wicca (which I thought stemmed from worship of Diana - another fertility goddess, of which there are quite a number as I mentioned). Certainly no question the Church spent an inordinate amount of effort attempting (fairly successfully) to extirpate ALL of the old religions - including wicca. They spent nearly as much time extirpating any heresies within their own ranks (think Mithraism or the flagelantes).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by nos482, posted 09-10-2002 6:07 PM nos482 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by nos482, posted 09-12-2002 10:25 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5901 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 98 of 125 (18214)
09-25-2002 6:15 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by peter borger
09-25-2002 3:20 AM


Hi Peter:
quote:
I say:
"Leaving out facts is also a common habit to popularise the hype of evolution. For instance, gene trees not matching family trees. I proposed several times to discuss the IL-1 beta genes so if you like..."

Sorry to butt in here. Would you remind those of us in the peanut gallery about the gist of your argument concerning interleukin-1 genes is again? I vaguely remember you mentioning it on some thread or other, but can't for the life of me find it. Thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by peter borger, posted 09-25-2002 3:20 AM peter borger has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024