Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Awesome Phillip E. Johnson
Percy
Member
Posts: 22502
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 4 of 16 (61964)
10-21-2003 2:51 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by MrHambre
10-21-2003 9:17 AM


The Skeptical Inquirer likes articles like this. This is so well done it deserves hard-copy treatment, you should submit it. In anticipation, here's a little feedback.
Last sentence of para 4: The best tack to take is to attack Johnson while portraying his audience as victims - I don't think you don't want to critisize Johnson's audience in the last sentence of this para. There are several other places where you're also negative about Johnson's audience. I thinkk you should attack only one villain at a time. Johnson appears all the worse if his audience is portrayed as unsuspecting dupes of his machinations. You don't have to praise them, just don't villainize them. Save it for another editorial.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by MrHambre, posted 10-21-2003 9:17 AM MrHambre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024