Notice, that even IF such a thing did happen and disprove evolution, the idea of a Creator being behind the phenomena would NOT be the first thought or conclusion but rather the idea that a "new" theory is required instead.
Right, because that's how science works - we propose natural explanations for natural phenomenon. That's the scientific methodology, and that's what scientists do when observation contradicts their models - they make new, better models.
Which is why I was insinuating that it "wouldn't" disprove evolution.
Evolution is not the position that God didn't create organisms. It's the position that the diversity of life on earth is the result of random mutation and natural selection.
A bear giving rise to a gorilla in one generation disproves that. It doesn't disprove that natural explanations can't account for natural phenomenon, and it
certainly doesn't prove that the God of the Bible exists.
If you want God to be included in a scientific theory, then you're going to have to prove that God exists and is avaliable to scientific examination. Otherwise no scientific model can ever be expected to take God into account.