Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pit bulls suck� Is it in their genes?
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 6 of 85 (220385)
06-28-2005 9:06 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by roxrkool
06-27-2005 9:15 PM


Re: Breed is only half the story...
Your post is pretty much what I think about pit bulls.
Another thing I would like to mention is that it's almost always very bad for a breed when a particular kind of dog becomes popular. Then everybody wants one but they don't want to do the research on the breed, wait maybe a year or more for a puppy, invest lots of time and education to learn how to choose, train and handle it, and pay a lot of money for a really great quality animal from a expert breeder who really cares about the breed and great temperament.
No, they see a movie or see some movie star or other celebrity with a particular breed and they want one NOW.
This happened with dalmatians when the Disney movie came out a while ago. The only dog that has ever been agressive to me and actually bit me was a dalmatian that was cooped up in a house all day.
When I was growing up, the number one purebred dog for dogbites were toy poodles, I think followed by cocker spaniels and doberman pinschers.
So, I do think that breeding is a problem, but so is the impulse purchase of pets for the reasons of trend or style. It's also the poor breeding practices of amateur breeders who are simply taking advantage of a money-making opportunity and have no clue what they are doing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by roxrkool, posted 06-27-2005 9:15 PM roxrkool has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by CK, posted 06-28-2005 10:13 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 46 of 85 (220901)
06-30-2005 7:56 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Hangdawg13
06-29-2005 1:07 PM


quote:
On the other hand, our family owned a Brittany Spaniel and she was the most hateful, agressive, and hyperactively annoying dog I've ever met.
Sounds like poor breeding for temperament and a bad choice of puppy for a pet.
quote:
The Brittany would only obey when she felt like it and whenever going for a walk she would almost choke herself to death on the leash. No amount of scolding or rewarding seemed to phase her. She was an independant woman.
Out of curiosity, did anyone in your family take the dog to obedience classes as a puppy or work with it consistently at any time?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Hangdawg13, posted 06-29-2005 1:07 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-02-2005 1:24 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 58 of 85 (221518)
07-03-2005 9:53 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by FliesOnly
06-30-2005 1:49 PM


Re: You need to convince me, not the other way around
quote:
I've always hated this type of excuse. But first, remember, this was a "thought experiment" that I deemed successful. Once the dogs are gone, their gone...enforcement is a non-issue. But I know where you're coming from and I still do not accept it as a valid reason, but that's probably a topic for another discussion.
The thing is, what's a pitbull or pitbul-type dog?
An English Bulldog has a bull-baiting heritage. What about Boxers? Or Mastiffs of various sorts?
You are talking really about dozens of breeds here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by FliesOnly, posted 06-30-2005 1:49 PM FliesOnly has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024