Buz, there was good reason for the Russian revolution of 1917. The resulting government/economic system had a lot to be said for it. Alas, for various reasons (World Wars I and II included?), things didn't live up to the idealism and things turned for the worse of Stalinism. But things need not have gone that route.
There is a middle ground between extreme capitalism and extreme socialism. Capitalism tends to work because it appeals to one of man's baser instincts - greed and self interest. Communism and socialism, on the other hand, has a greater concern for the common well being of community and society.
So, why are you such a knee-jerk supporter of an economy based on greed? Might there not also be proper room for policy more aimed at taking care of community and society?
Yes, there will always be some lazy leaches on society. That is now the case, with examples both of the poor and of the wealthy. But it is the wealthy that have the resources to contribute to the betterment of community and society. The system has been good to the wealthy - Why shouldn't they pay back to help maintain the overall health of the community and society that made them wealthy? Some of them are, some are not.
Or do we now need a new American revolution, where those that have material wealth far beyond any practical need get killed?
Buzsaw writes:
1. Hitler was very popular in Germany before and after gaining power.
2. Hitler was a slick and capable orator who chould appear as all things to all citizens.
3. Hitler's policies were quite socialistic.
4. Hitler promised change and the people got change.
5. Hitler was what some refer to as a messiah figure.
I would dispute #3. Care to substantiate that assertion?
2. Hitler was a slick and capable orator who chould appear as all things to all citizens.
Some leaders are more charismatic public speakers than others. It can be used either to sell good policy or to sell a snow job bad pollicy.
In all, I would think that Ronald "the great communicator" Reagan would perhaps match up far better in those qualities of 1, 2, 4, and 5.
BUT PERHAPS ALL THIS BELONGS IN A TOPIC OF ITS OWN.
Moose
Added by edit:
Forgot to include
Russian Revolution - Wikipedia(1917)
Is there a strong parallel between Tzar Nicholas II and George W. Bush?
Edited by Minnemooseus, : See above.