Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The bible and homosexuality
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 136 of 323 (113628)
06-08-2004 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by PecosGeorge
06-08-2004 1:50 PM


Re: Bonobos, etal
If you wish to identify with animals, that is your affair. Man is created on a higher order
Even if true (which certinly seems unlikely), it has nothing to do with anything.
Even if the Bible condemned homosexuality, and many of the Christians here don't believe that is so, it would still have no bearing on things like the absurd opposition to homosexual marriage.
What I don't understand is why Christian groups, regardless of their personal beliefs, would oppose such a reasonable proposal?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-08-2004 1:50 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-08-2004 5:33 PM jar has replied
 Message 150 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-09-2004 12:54 PM jar has replied
 Message 169 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-10-2004 9:03 AM jar has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 137 of 323 (113640)
06-08-2004 3:56 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by PecosGeorge
06-08-2004 1:50 PM


As it is, believers go round and round with unbelievers, where they should not. Round and round has no end in sight, no solution, no agreement, not that any of this is wanted.
No, there's a very simple solution in sight - let gay people have the same rights as straight people, and stop tying them up to fences and beating them to death.
It's pretty frickin' simple. We don't want to turn all Christians into gay people. We just want you guys to leave gay people the hell alone.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-08-2004 1:50 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-08-2004 5:31 PM crashfrog has replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 138 of 323 (113646)
06-08-2004 4:28 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by almeyda
06-08-2004 8:41 AM


Why mention reproduction then?
No it doesnt. It isnt logical. Even if they have surgery to stop them from having babies it is still the natural way to have sex. And God gave sex not just to reproduce. Of course at the start of marriage its to begin a family. But God isnt asking 80yr olds to not be sterile or else they will sin. They are a married couple that can freely express their love for each other. My feeble attempt at logic?. Ok then.
"And God gave sex not just to reproduce."
Then why did you mention reproduction so many times? Since you now suggest that it has nothing to do with the issue.
"They are a married couple that can freely express their love for each other."
So it is for expressing their love for each other? Do you think that a gay couple don't love each other?
The logic seems to be feeble so far.
Your problem is buried under this phrase:
"it is still the natural way to have sex"
Would you please describe what you consider the natural way to have sex? I think it is clear that you don't consider anal sex to be natural. Since hetrosexual couples have sex that why maybe you can tell us what it has to do specifically with homosexuality?
It does appear that the only thing your argument is based on is the idea of a "natural way". Let's discuss that to see if there is anything there but a personal opinion and a desire to control other peoples lives.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by almeyda, posted 06-08-2004 8:41 AM almeyda has not replied

1.61803
Member (Idle past 1533 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 139 of 323 (113655)
06-08-2004 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by PecosGeorge
06-08-2004 1:50 PM


Re: Bonobos, etal
Pecos George writes:
If you wish to identify with animals, that is your affair. Man is created on a higher order...
Mans order is primates, I identify man in the kingdom animalia.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-08-2004 1:50 PM PecosGeorge has not replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6902 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 140 of 323 (113660)
06-08-2004 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by crashfrog
06-08-2004 3:56 PM


?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by crashfrog, posted 06-08-2004 3:56 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by crashfrog, posted 06-08-2004 6:05 PM PecosGeorge has replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6902 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 141 of 323 (113661)
06-08-2004 5:33 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by jar
06-08-2004 2:16 PM


Re: Bonobos, etal
What is unlikely?
Animals are created equal to humans?
Oops, I'm going round and round.....pardon me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by jar, posted 06-08-2004 2:16 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by jar, posted 06-08-2004 6:53 PM PecosGeorge has not replied
 Message 144 by Sleeping Dragon, posted 06-08-2004 11:24 PM PecosGeorge has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 142 of 323 (113672)
06-08-2004 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by PecosGeorge
06-08-2004 5:31 PM


Did I stutter?
Look, all our side wants is for Christians to stop nosing into behaviors that have no discernable effect on anybody and to stop standing in the way of affording all couples the same rights that are currently afforded only to some.
It's not rocket science, PG. It's compromise. You think gay sex is wrong? Fine, don't have it. You'll notice that none of us are asking you to have sex with another man. But plenty of other people have a differing opinion about how suitable homosexuality is for themselves, and all we want people like you to do is stop standing in the way of their right to excerise their sexuality in any way that pleases and is sufficiently safe for the participants involved.
It's not clear to me what part of that you don't understand.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-08-2004 5:31 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by arachnophilia, posted 06-09-2004 5:51 AM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 149 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-09-2004 12:50 PM crashfrog has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 143 of 323 (113677)
06-08-2004 6:53 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by PecosGeorge
06-08-2004 5:33 PM


Not round and round, just running away.
But you still have not answered the questions in Message 136.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-08-2004 5:33 PM PecosGeorge has not replied

Sleeping Dragon
Inactive Member


Message 144 of 323 (113714)
06-08-2004 11:24 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by PecosGeorge
06-08-2004 5:33 PM


To PecosGeorge:
May I ask a question? In your opinion:
Is homosexuality (the attraction towards individuals of the same sex as you):
a) A conscious choice made by the individual.
or
b) Determined by genes?
Patiently awaiting your reply.

"Respect is like money, it can only be earned. When it is given, it becomes pittance"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-08-2004 5:33 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-09-2004 1:04 PM Sleeping Dragon has replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 145 of 323 (113722)
06-08-2004 11:51 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Zachariah
06-08-2004 12:31 AM


Re: my reason LAM
Zachariah writes:
The sphincter muscle of your anus was made to allow things to go out only.
People's feet are not made to wear high heels.
Over prolonged "misuse" that muscle will not function as well as one used correctly.
This is a myth. However, we know for a fact that prolonged use of high heels will seriously damage a woman's feet and knees.
We now have proof of new medical problems dealing with anal sex.
I have proof that your head has no brain in it. Of course I can't really give you anything solid, but I think it is justified because you are not giving me anything solid either. Give me at least an explanation and I will apologize for calling you an airhead.
I know that a.s. isn't for male gays only, none-the-less homosexuality in a whole is unnatural. Two women cannot produce a child nor can two men. The whole idea behind procreation of the species is so we can go on. If we were all gay life would die.
If we were all doctors, civilization would cease to exist. If we were all presidents, civilization would cease to exist. If we were all heterosexual women, civilization would cease to exist. If we were all heterosexual men, civilization would cease to exist.
The point is not all people are doctors, presidents, straight women, or straight men. Base on your logic, since not everyone is gay, there is absolutely nothing wrong with homosexuality.
This is why I'm against it.
You and your completely illogical reasons are the reason I want a gene pool clean-up.
Gay friends? Yes, I have some. They are some of my closest friends. Are they wrong? Yes, as far as I'm concerned they are.
Uh.... what does this have to do with anything we are talking about?
No Bible thumping here bro. -Z
Stalin was not a bible thumping SOB and he did some of the most terrible things in history. Just a little fact for you to think about.
By the way, I don't take statements like yours very well BECAUSE I've seen absolutely no valid explanation whatsoever. Give me more than unsupported assertions PLEASE!

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Zachariah, posted 06-08-2004 12:31 AM Zachariah has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1373 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 146 of 323 (113784)
06-09-2004 5:51 AM
Reply to: Message 142 by crashfrog
06-08-2004 6:05 PM


Did I stutter?
Look, all our side wants is for Christians to stop nosing into behaviors that have no discernable effect on anybody and to stop standing in the way of affording all couples the same rights that are currently afforded only to some.
It's not rocket science, PG. It's compromise. You think gay sex is wrong? Fine, don't have it. You'll notice that none of us are asking you to have sex with another man. But plenty of other people have a differing opinion about how suitable homosexuality is for themselves, and all we want people like you to do is stop standing in the way of their right to excerise their sexuality in any way that pleases and is sufficiently safe for the participants involved.
It's not clear to me what part of that you don't understand.
amen.
it is not anyone's business what people do with their private lives, and there is not justifiable reason to get offended over other peoples' business that has nothing to do with you. ever.
legally, your rights stop at the next person's, and jurisdication of the legislature stops at a certain point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by crashfrog, posted 06-08-2004 6:05 PM crashfrog has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1373 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 147 of 323 (113785)
06-09-2004 5:56 AM
Reply to: Message 126 by Zachariah
06-08-2004 12:31 AM


Re: my reason LAM
Two women cannot produce a child nor can two men. The whole idea behind procreation of the species is so we can go on.
the people asserting the view that homosexuality is not natural may wish to know about this species of lizard that lives in arizona and nevada, cnemidophorus uniparens. they are parthenogenetic unisexual pseudocopulators.
or, using the slang term, lesbians. all of them.
you see, apparently they are ALL female, and technically reproduce asexually, making clones of themselves. but in order to do so, they still require sexual stimulus, from another lizard.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Zachariah, posted 06-08-2004 12:31 AM Zachariah has not replied

truthlover
Member (Idle past 4089 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 148 of 323 (113795)
06-09-2004 6:35 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by berberry
06-07-2004 2:59 AM


Re: The racist, sexist, homophobic apostle Paul
Paul was not a moral man in any sense of the word
This just isn't true.
However, the reason he should be ignored today is that, since his time, we have come to realize that many of the practices he either endorsed or tolerated are immoral.
Since that time is the general opinion of a lot of people that one or two things he endorsed or tolerated should not be endorsed or tolerated, such as slavery or a subordinate role for women. There are also a lot of people, not a majority or barely a majority, who disagree with Paul on a lot of things, and there are a very, very few who would agree with you that many of the practices he endorsed or tolerated are immoral.
"We have come to realize" is utterly meaningless in the west, where the idea of how people should live varies immensely. People in general are way too alone and unhappy to make "we have come to realize" mean anything impressive.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by berberry, posted 06-07-2004 2:59 AM berberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by berberry, posted 06-10-2004 12:30 AM truthlover has replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6902 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 149 of 323 (113896)
06-09-2004 12:50 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by crashfrog
06-08-2004 6:05 PM


Nowhere
will you find a post where I deny your rights to choose how you live your life. Neither does God deny it.
It's not my business and I thank God for that.
I pointed out and point out that God declines to accept certain behaviors as acceptable to him.
Neither has he stopped you, neither will he, neither will I. He does not stand in your way, neither do I.
I speak for myself, not other Christians, not other people of any kind, not the laws laid down in this country.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by crashfrog, posted 06-08-2004 6:05 PM crashfrog has not replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6902 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 150 of 323 (113898)
06-09-2004 12:54 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by jar
06-08-2004 2:16 PM


Many of the Christians
here also believe that upon death one either goes to heaven or hell. All those Christians who believe so, are wrong.
It is said of man that he is created in the image of God, in the image of God created he man. This is not said of animals.
This message has been edited by PecosGeorge, 06-09-2004 11:55 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by jar, posted 06-08-2004 2:16 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by jar, posted 06-09-2004 1:17 PM PecosGeorge has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024