Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why are there venomous snakes?
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 75 (128056)
07-27-2004 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Eta_Carinae
07-26-2004 9:15 PM


......why are there venomous snakes that specifically use the venom for paralysing their prey?
Perhaps the Biblical answer lies in the details of the curse upon the serpents in Genesis 3: 15, "And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; he shall bruise your head and you shall bruise his heel."
The serpent was radically changed at the fall, according to the Genesis account. The clear implication is that the prefallen ones had longer legs and were walking and possibly flying creatures. Imo, the prefallen serpents were the dinosaurs whose offspring became snakes, lizzards, allegators, etc. They are all of the serpent family. Likely two not mentioned results were diminished intelligence and poisonous venom. The serpents were the most intelligent of the animal kingdom at creation according to the account. A lot happened at this catastrophy of the fall, including thorny plants and so forth. I believe some plants became poisonous as well.
I do not agree with most creationists such as ICR who believe and teach that dinosaurs were in Noah's ark. I do believe however, that the parent prefallen dinosaurs lived very long lives and many survived until the flood which would have been about 1500 years since many humans lived nearly a thousand years.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Eta_Carinae, posted 07-26-2004 9:15 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Loudmouth, posted 07-27-2004 7:56 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 75 (128211)
07-27-2004 10:35 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Loudmouth
07-27-2004 7:56 PM


According to the fossil record, dinosaurs are not the ancestors of any living reptile today. However, they are possibly the ancestors of birds, although that is still a hotly debated topic.
You are speaking as an evolutionist. This change involves a supernatural overhaul/adjustment of the genes which science cannot account for.
Then you have abandoned a literal reading of Genesis which very emphatically states that all of the creatures that creep upon the earth were put onto the ark. If they were around, they would have been on the ark if they survived till the flood.
No I haven't and no they wouldn't have. Each of the various zapped belly crawling offspring of the parent dinosaurs would be descended from the dinosaur forbear of the variety it descended from. Nice try though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Loudmouth, posted 07-27-2004 7:56 PM Loudmouth has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Eta_Carinae, posted 07-27-2004 10:44 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 75 (128215)
07-27-2004 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Yaro
07-27-2004 9:50 PM


Re: nothing would rot
You know, according to the pre-fall logic, nothing would rot
Our digestive sistem relies on the rotting and breaking down of matter. In this process, you have to kill things. And the bacteria in you stoumach would have to die off or overpopulate and consume you!
Furthermore, fruits are alive. Just as alive as your hadn, so tearing one from a tree is essentialy killing it. Eating grass is killing it, etc.
Food for thought
It takes little thought for a sound rebut of this logic. Where in Genesis does it say or even imply that plants of the garden would not die or be eaten and that bacteria would not die? Where in Geneses, for that matter does it say brute animals would not die? True, man would not need kill animals for food, but that does not mean the animals would not die of old age. The only implication of eternal life before the fall pertained to man who, after all was created in the image of his creator, Jehovah God who was an eternal being.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Yaro, posted 07-27-2004 9:50 PM Yaro has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Yaro, posted 07-27-2004 11:18 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 75 (128216)
07-27-2004 10:55 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by SRO2
07-27-2004 10:48 PM


Re: nothing would rot
Corn is digestively indestructible, I have proof, but this is the one time that the scientific community doesn't seem to be interested in my evidence.
I had an ear for dinner today, but don't plan to save my feces for seed next year. Maybe for fertilizer. Yuk!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by SRO2, posted 07-27-2004 10:48 PM SRO2 has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 75 (128218)
07-27-2004 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Eta_Carinae
07-27-2004 10:44 PM


Re: LOL
You have no evidence of this except an appeal from your own ignorance. You are right up there as the most scientifically inept poster on any message board I have ever seen.
Your disgreements are always based upon infant like miscomceptions of science. AIG & ICR have done a great job of indoctrination. In fact, of course, you are just what they are looking for - someone who cannot figure out anything of a technical/scientific nature and just wholeheartedly swallow the BS of others looking for dupes.
Eta, can you spell C R E A T I O N I S T? I am a creationist who believes in a supernatural dimension in the universe and which, imo, mainline science bulligerently denies. I speak as a creationist with the understanding that there is that supernatural dimension and a creator supreme being who can do things natural science cannot explain. You and I are ideological opponents here debating from our respective viewpoints. Why is it that you think you should disrespectfully insult your counterpart whenever your counterpart on the EvC Forum debates from a creationist viewpoint? When are you ever going to grow up, Eta, and learn a little respect? Hmmm??
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 07-27-2004 10:10 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Eta_Carinae, posted 07-27-2004 10:44 PM Eta_Carinae has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Eta_Carinae, posted 07-27-2004 11:20 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 30 by Loudmouth, posted 07-27-2004 11:55 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 75 (128224)
07-27-2004 11:24 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by doctrbill
07-27-2004 10:34 PM


Re: nothing would rot
There can be no life without death
............in the plant kingdom.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by doctrbill, posted 07-27-2004 10:34 PM doctrbill has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Yaro, posted 07-27-2004 11:36 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 75 (128226)
07-27-2004 11:29 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Yaro
07-27-2004 11:18 PM


Re: nothing would rot
Some folks brlive there was no death at all before the fall.
Yaro, I didn't ask what some folks believe. What matters in this debate is what does the scriptural text say?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Yaro, posted 07-27-2004 11:18 PM Yaro has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 75 (128229)
07-27-2004 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Eta_Carinae
07-27-2004 11:20 PM


Re: LOL
You don't have an understanding and what manifests itself as a viewpoint is nothing but a PRATT list.
You never argue anything from a science standpoint you just stubbornly regurgitate material you have picked up of a Creationst website without giving it thought.
Eta, I haven't done a website search in days. Do you think you have some kind of psycic powers or something? Well, if you think you do, let me assure you, you don't. Why in heck should a creationist debate from a secularistic scientific viewpoint?? If you want that, poleeeeze go and join some forum which doesn't allow creationist viewpoints expressed. Again, Eta, when, oh when, are you ever going to grow up and learn a little respect in this town???
You'll mention something like 'decaying speed of light' without even understanding what the ramifications of such a thing.
When has buzsaw ever used this phrase in debate in this forum, Eta? Please document. Put up or shut up!!
You'll mention 'decaying magnetic field' without even knowing what a magnetic field is.
Ditto. Put up or shut up, Eta!!
That's not a viewpoint it's an involuntary response akin to blinking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Eta_Carinae, posted 07-27-2004 11:20 PM Eta_Carinae has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Eta_Carinae, posted 07-28-2004 11:44 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 75 (128231)
07-27-2004 11:55 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Yaro
07-27-2004 11:36 PM


Re: nothing would rot
umm... last time I checked Bacteria werent plants.
Did you know bacteria multiply by the millions every second? If they didn't die, or eat the decomposing bio-matter around them, they would litteraly smoother the world in their mass.
Like the Blob
Bacteria eat dead things, they decompose things, they ferment them. Also, another chink in the armor of the argumen.
SOME BACTERIA DONT DIE OF OLD AGE!
Thats right, many kinds of bacteria are essentialy imortal, they don't age, and don't die as a result of age. So how do you account for this?
Alright, make it plants and some bacteria. Big deal!! Yaro, it's obvious, you're desperate here, for a thread of something, anything for refutation. Oh well, I sense your need.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Yaro, posted 07-27-2004 11:36 PM Yaro has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Yaro, posted 07-28-2004 12:00 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 40 by doctrbill, posted 07-28-2004 1:08 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 75 (128236)
07-28-2004 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Loudmouth
07-27-2004 11:55 PM


Re: LOL
The only thing mainstream science states is that supernatural mechanisms do not affect natural phenomena, not that the supernatural does not exist.
Oh, really!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now, that's a new one on me!!!!!!!!!! So humanistic higher education in America is now admitting that the supernatural dimension in the universe is a reality!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOWIE!!!!!!!!! LM, pray tell now, which universities now, can I send my kid to who will teach him that the supernatural phenomonen in the universe actually exists and that he can be sure of that???????? Harvard, Yale, Dartmouth?? Which ones, LM?
Also, in a previous post, you claimed that the dinosaurs lived up until the flood, yet you claim that they were not put onto the ark. From post #11 of this thread:
.........and LM, what did I say about that in refutation to your post? Please read thoughtfully and carefully and there's your answer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Loudmouth, posted 07-27-2004 11:55 PM Loudmouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Loudmouth, posted 07-28-2004 12:43 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 75 (128237)
07-28-2004 12:16 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Yaro
07-28-2004 12:00 AM


Re: nothing would rot
Im not desparete for anything.
I was just following the train of logic from the OP
Well, then, peace, Yaro. Maybe you need also to thoughtfully reread responses to the OP. {Shrugs).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 07-27-2004 11:26 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Yaro, posted 07-28-2004 12:00 AM Yaro has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 75 (128238)
07-28-2004 12:20 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by jar
07-27-2004 11:22 PM


Re: nothing would rot
Not that it matters much since no one has ever been able to provide any evidence that there was a fall, or eden, or serpent, or Adam, or Eve or...
..........Nor to refute the fact.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by jar, posted 07-27-2004 11:22 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by coffee_addict, posted 07-28-2004 12:29 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 75 (128247)
07-28-2004 12:44 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by coffee_addict
07-28-2004 12:29 AM


Re: nothing would rot
Um... buz, the burden of proof always falls on the side that claims the positive. Otherwise, people could claim that there are green goblins running around and we would have to accept that as a fact until someone can disprove that they don't exist... which would be a mess because how the hell do you refute something that doesn't exist in the first place?
Ok Lam, which positive posts of my ideological adversaries have they positively proven? Please specify.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by coffee_addict, posted 07-28-2004 12:29 AM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by coffee_addict, posted 07-28-2004 12:45 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 75 (128256)
07-28-2004 1:10 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by Loudmouth
07-28-2004 12:43 AM


Re: LOL
Probably all of them since each one has a theology department.
..........and which of the miraculous Biblical claims do they teach?
I didn't say that mainstream science says that there IS a supernatural realm. Mainstream science says that it may or may not exist
Oh, so since it may or may not exist, they really don't know and since they don't know, they play it safe and ultimately the student is taught that it doesn't exist?? Is that how it works?
,
but it doesn't matter to science since the supernatural does not affect what it is measuring, the physical, natural world.
Oh, so maybe the supernatural exists, but for all practictal purposes and to suit our own personal ideologies, we're just going to assume in this class that it doesn't exist and go with what is secularistically natural? Is that the way it works and is that why the kid graduates fully indoctinated into humanistic secularism?
The supernatural is a focus for theology and philosophy, not science. Science deals with the idea of God as much as it deals with which girl OutBack Jack should pick. It is not something that science is set up to deal with or explain.
So now, we come back full circle to my original point that SCIENTIFICALLY THERE IS NO SUPERNATURAL DIMENSION IN THE UNIVERSE ACCORDING TO CONVENTIONAL SCIENCE AS TAUGHT IN SECULARISTIC UNIVERSITIES.
So again, we have the prefallen dinosaurs in their original form, and they lived until the flood waters came. Therefore, since they were alive when God commanded that Noah fill the Ark with everything that crept on the earth, the still alive prefallen dinosaurs should have made it onto the Ark. You claim that they didn't, which means that you don't agree that either Noah didn't follow God's commandment, or you don't believe in a literal translation of Genesis. Or possibility number three, that this whole cooked up scheme is your own fantasy world conconcted to frustrate and beguile those who abide by logical and consistent arguments. I am thinking a combination of options two and three.
LM, I fully explained that the descendendents of the originals were in the ark. If your mind cannot comprehend that, I'm afraid I can't help you. By your logic, all the forbears of the ark passengers should be aboard the voyage. LOL and bonvoyu. I'm hittin hay! G'nite.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Loudmouth, posted 07-28-2004 12:43 AM Loudmouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by crashfrog, posted 07-28-2004 1:15 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 59 by Loudmouth, posted 07-28-2004 2:19 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 75 (128263)
07-28-2004 1:20 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by doctrbill
07-28-2004 1:08 AM


Re: nothing would rot
Any facts which challenge your point of view should give you pause to reconsider your conclusions. Well, that would be the case for a reasonable person.
Specifically which facts, Doc?
P.S. - Your position regarding the existence of death prior the entrance of sin is unique. What brings you to this conclusion? You must realize that this puts you on the fringe Christendom, which asserts that there was no death - period - before the entrance of sin.
And by the way, the truth of life is this:
There can be no life without death.
1. Please teach me how there could be no life without death with Adam and Eve in the garden.
2. You have yet to aprise me of your notion that Genesis states or implies there is no death of things other than mankind in the garden of Eden. I'm all eyes, awaiting this revelation from you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by doctrbill, posted 07-28-2004 1:08 AM doctrbill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by doctrbill, posted 07-28-2004 9:42 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024