I guess my gut instinct is to agree with them.
I am no tree-hugger and I put the interests of humans before other animals, but it is difficult to challenge their arguments on a biological level.
Evolution tells us there is really nothing special about humans (except our excessive reverence for our own species) and all evidence suggests these animals have high intelligence and are capable of a great deal of sensitivity, emotion, empathy, etc.
Also, wouldn't that make harming a great ape punishable at the same level as harming a human? I see some major legal issues arising here.
Again, I am curious about those who would oppose this proposition and what sort of reasoning they might use to justify their opposition (scientific, religious, political).