To prove evoulution, the challenge is "create" a simple squirming and REPRODUCING worm or flying and reproducing fly in your lab out of nothing.
This is such a blatant strawman arguement.
A. Abiogensis =/ evolution
2. The theorized first life forms would be nowhere near as complex as a worm or a fly
If on the other hand you can not produce a worm or a fly, then just shut up and accept that somebody more intelligent than humans made us. Until you make that squirming worm all your words are just plain rhetorics to say the least. Science fiction, in other words.
I issue a counter-challenge; produce the designer (and his/her/it's designer and so on), until you do so your words are just plain rhetoric. Fairy tales in other words. If you cannot produce the designer, then may I suggest that you just shut up and accept that scientists actually have a clue about reality while religious zealots do not.
Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor