Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Board Administration ⇒ Suggestions and Questions ⇒

Draft of anti-ID letter to the editor

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Draft of anti-ID letter to the editor
Max Power
Member (Idle past 6037 days)
Posts: 32
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Joined: 06-03-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 8 of 17 (409602)
07-10-2007 1:15 PM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Minnemooseus
07-10-2007 5:36 AM

Not a scientific theory
I'm not sure what Mr. Erickson's intent was with his article, but one thing you left out was how ID is in no way scientific. It isn't falsifiable, has no predictive power, and doesn't add anything to the table as far as scientific inquiry goes. I gather that Mr. Erickson isn't trying to push it as a scientific theory though.
​
Otherwise I like it. It is straight to the point.
​
Max
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Minnemooseus, posted 07-10-2007 5:36 AM Minnemooseus has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024