Why must evidence be presented, apart from the original manuscripts?
Please note that we don't have the autographs. We have manuscripts and translations that don't match. Thus we don't have the original documents(autographs) or even the original manuscripts(copies).
I am actually going to refute the idea that ACTS 9:3-9 contradicts Acts 22:6-9. I have recently realized that the information provided in those chapters and verses above is ambiguous.