ICANT writes
quote:
I found this when I googled angels pushing the planets around.
http://www.12x30.net/angel.html
Speculation about Archangels
But it does not mention angels pushing the planets around only that the Arch in Archangel talked of the planets moving in an arch.
I don't think you are looking hard enough. Here is something to look at while you're at it.
Chick.com: Big Daddy?
I'm particularly interested in one segment of it.
So, supposedly, Jesus has been holding atoms together so that we may exist.
quote:
What I question is the blind faith in the origin of the universe and the origin of life.
ICANT, I think everyone has been answering this statement of yours several dozen times already. The answer to both origin of univers and origin of life is "we simply don't know". There are educated guesses as well as wild guesses. But when it comes down to it, we simply don't know.
By saying that anyone claims to know and then point out that that person believes in it by blind faith, you are just using a strawman argument.
quote:
Scientific models have nothing to do with the origin of the universe and the origin of life.
You're right, of course, which is why noone has claimed that we know anything about the origin of life or the origin of the universe. We have a few educated guesses here and there. Yes, we have a few proposed models for the origin of life and the origin of the universe. But those are simply proposed models and chances are they will not survive for long.
ICANT, are you really trying to be difficult? Despite the fact that many people have said science doesn't know the answers to these questions, you continue to claim that science does claim to know the answers to these questions. Aren't you forgetting the bear false witness thing?
quote:
They can also see how many scientific papers were cited as evidence by you are anyone else.
I don't know if this is intentional or not on your part, but you seem to be trying very hard to equate biblical accounts with scientific papers as if scientific papers refuse to present the data require you to believe in them on faith. The opposite is true, of course. Anything and everything presented in scientific papers have to be repeatable by anyone and everyone that tries to repeat the experiments. The same cannot be said about miracles presented in biblical texts. And if a published result cannot be repeated, the person(s) who presented the paper can kiss their careers goodbye.
An example off the top of my head is cold fusion. Those researchers who claimed they discovered cold fusion couldn't even sell burgers after the fiasco.
Edited by teen4christ, : No reason given.
Edited by Admin, : Fix images.