|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Does the Book of Mormon contradict the Bible? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2727 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Kbertsche.
kbertsche writes: So do you propose that there was three hours of darkness in Palestine and three days of darkness in the Americas? Yep, that's what it says. Do you have a problem with this?If so, why? -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ochaye Member (Idle past 5268 days) Posts: 307 Joined: |
How is it that people have problems?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2727 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Ochaye.
ochaye writes: How is it that people have problems? Mares eat oats and does eat oats and I'll be home for Christmas.
I'll tell you what I'm talking about if you tell me what you're talking about. Edited by Bluejay, : Formatting -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
kbertsche Member (Idle past 2161 days) Posts: 1427 From: San Jose, CA, USA Joined: |
quote:So how do you reconcile your position with this passage from the Book of Mormon? Helaman 14:27 And he said unto me that while the thunder and the lightning lasted, and the tempest, that these things should be, and that darkness should cover the face of the whole earth for the space of three days.
Was the Book of Mormon wrong when it prophecied that the darkness would cover not only the Americas, but the whole earth, for three days? Edited by kbertsche, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
kbertsche Member (Idle past 2161 days) Posts: 1427 From: San Jose, CA, USA Joined: |
Of the 5 contradictions that I've posted so far, this is by far the most fundamental and important, so I'd like to add some quotes to it. As I said in Message 58, "The Bible says that we are saved by God's grace, through faith alone, not due to any works, achievements, or efforts on our part."
I quoted Eph 2:8-9 in Message 58. Titus 3:5 is also quite clear:
Titus 3:5 he saved us not by works of righteousness that we have done but on the basis of his mercy, through the washing of the new birth and the renewing of the Holy Spirit, In contrast, the Book of Mormon teaches that our works are necessary as a means of salvation. We saw this in 2 Nephi 25:23, but it is also clear in Moroni 10:32:
Moroni 10:32 and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; According to the Book of Mormon, God's grace is sufficient to save us only if we clean up our lives and live righteously first. The Bible teaches the opposite. We are unable to clean up our lives or to live righteously until after God saves us, and He saves us on the basis of His mercy and grace alone.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2727 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Kbertsche.
kbertsche writes: According to the Book of Mormon, God's grace is sufficient to save us only if we clean up our lives and live righteously first. The Bible teaches the opposite. We are unable to clean up our lives or to live righteously until after God saves us, and He saves us on the basis of His mercy and grace alone. quote: The LDS Church does not use the NIV, but I like the wording for this particular chapter. It seems that you've done a good job exposing a situation in which the Bible contradicts itself. But, there is a biblical precedent for the LDS belief in works, so I'm afraid Mormonism passes this test easily. -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2727 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Kbertsche.
kbertsche writes: So how do you reconcile your position with this passage from the Book of Mormon?
quote: What Samuel prophesied didn't happen exactly the way Samuel prophesied it. What you've exposed is a prophet making a minor mistake in his prophecy. This is akin to Moses smiting the rock when he was supposed to speak to it (Numbers 20: 7-12). The BoM contains a scripture that covers such problems, too:
quote: But, it didn't actually cover the entire earth, and the BoM doesn't say that it did, so you've got no contradiction with actual events. -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
kbertsche Member (Idle past 2161 days) Posts: 1427 From: San Jose, CA, USA Joined: |
quote:You are in good company if you think that James contradicts Paul. Martin Luther thought something similar. But I disagree. Salvation comes by faith alone, with good works as a result of salvation. Note that James does not use the word "saved," he uses the word "justified." Explaining the nuances in detail would take some time and would take us off-topic. But I'll try to lay it out very briefly. The word "justified" is literally "declared righteous" in the NT. It usually implies "declared righteous by God" and refers to salvation in Scripture, but not always (this is easily demonstrated with a concordance). Here James is using it in the sense of "declared to be righteous by others" or "demonstrated to be righteous." As James says, this is only possible by looking at one's deeds, since faith cannot be seen by man. Compare Js 2 with Rom 4-5, and ask yourself, "When was Abraham justified and on what basis?" Paul and James are speaking of two different justifications. Note that Paul hints at James' usage of the word in Rom 4:2. But as I said earlier, discussion of how to interpret James is irrelevant to whether or not the Book of Mormon contradicts what Paul wrote. It clearly does, as you seem to admit. Unless you can successfully argue for a different interpretation of either Paul's writings or the Book of Mormon, this stands as a clear (and fundamental) contradiction between the Book of Mormon and the Bible, answering the challenge of the OP.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
kbertsche Member (Idle past 2161 days) Posts: 1427 From: San Jose, CA, USA Joined: |
quote:Your explanation might be able to reconcile the passages in the Book of Mormon with one another and with the Bible, but it seems to me that this is an uncomfortable reconciliation. You are forced to the position that a prophecy in the Book of Mormon is wrong. And you have the odd situation of three hours' darkness in Palestine and three days' darkness in the Americas. Do Mormons propose a reason for the different lengths of time? It seems much more likely to me that Joseph Smith simply mis-remembered the story, substituting "day" for "hour." Does the Book of Mormon ever mention the three hours' darkness in Palestine? It would strengthen your case somewhat if the Book of Mormon mentioned both, but even if it does the three days could still be simply a mistake on Joseph Smith's part.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
kbertsche Member (Idle past 2161 days) Posts: 1427 From: San Jose, CA, USA Joined: |
quote:Your explanation reveals a sixth contradiction between the Book of Mormon and the Bible: the required accuracy of prophecy. The Bible speaks of both true and false prophets of God. One characteristic of a true prophet is that his prophecies come true:
Deut 18:20-22
According to the Bible, prophets of God were not allowed any errors in their prophecy. But you say that the Book of Mormon does allow prophets of God to have errors in their prophecy. This is a contradiction between the Book of Mormon and the Bible. According to to the Bible, Samuel from the Book of Mormon should have been classed as a false prophet and killed. But according to the Book of Mormon, he is a true prophet.But if any prophet presumes to speak anything in my name that I have not authorized him to speak, or speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet must die. Now if you say to yourselves, ‘How can we tell that a message is not from the LORD?’— whenever a prophet speaks in my name and the prediction is not fulfilled, then I have not spoken it; the prophet has presumed to speak it, so you need not fear him. [Note that this is unrelated to Moses striking the rock. Moses was not speaking a prediction in God's name which turned out to be false (see wording of Deut 18 above). Moses was disobeying God's instruction. Yes, this was a very bad thing. But disobedience is not the same as making a false prophecy.]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2727 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Kbertsche.
kbertsche writes: You are in good company if you think that James contradicts Paul. Martin Luther thought something similar. But I disagree. Ah, but, right there, you admit that the epistle to James can be interpreted to support the Mormon view. So, what you're saying is that the BoM only contradicts the Bible if James 2 is interpreted the way you interpret it? So, why do you think the interpretation of James 2 is off-topic? -----
kbertsche writes: Note that James does not use the word "saved," he uses the word "justified." Note also that the epistle to James includes this:
quote: Faith is made complete by works. This puts the operative power on works. Thus, works are an active part of salvation. On a related note: why did God give commandments if works don't matter? -----
kbertsche writes: It clearly does [contradict the Bible], as you seem to admit. Okay, so what you're saying is that, since the Bible contains two contradictory statements, if the BoM contradicts either one of these, it is false. I say the BoM teaching on this matter is clearly based on biblical precedent, despite your whining that you disagree with the interpretation. -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2727 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Kbertsche.
kbertsche writes: You are forced to the position that a prophecy in the Book of Mormon is wrong. Uncomfortable? What's so uncomfortable about it? I am equally comfortable with the belief that the Flood did not cover the entire Earth, despite what it says in the Bible. If I were a Nephite, and I saw all those cities being destroyed, and experienced the vapor of darkness for three days, do you really think it would cause a religious crisis for me if I found out that only my half of the planet was covered, instead of the whole thing? What if it were later revealed that Jesus had actually broken six loaves, or that he had really only fed 1000 people, instead of 4000? Would that shake your faith? Besides, as far as Samuel the Lamanite (or anybody he told) ever knew, the darkness did cover the entire earth. -----
kbertsche writes: And you have the odd situation of three hours' darkness in Palestine and three days' darkness in the Americas. Do Mormons propose a reason for the different lengths of time? We're talking about miracles, Kbertsche: the reason we propose is, "Goddidit." What else needs to be explained? -----
kbertsche writes: It seems much more likely to me that Joseph Smith simply mis-remembered the story, substituting "day" for "hour." Joseph Smith did have his own Bible, you know, and he spent a lot of time reading it (you've heard of the Joseph Smith Translation, I assume?). Edited by Bluejay, : little dashes between segments -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2727 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Kbertsche.
kbertsche writes: According to the Bible, prophets of God were not allowed any errors in their prophecy. You're not going to get far with this one. The Book of Mormon was an abridged compilation of many hundreds and hundreds of records that the Nephites had written. It's entirely possible that it wasn't Samuel's mistake, but the mistake of one of the abridgers, Mormon or Moroni. I meant for that to be in my last post, but I guess I thought the quote from Moroni about the possibility of faults in the BoM covered that, so I didn't explicitly state it. ----- At any rate, people are humans, and all humans make mistakes, even prophets. It was meant to be a sign for the Nephites, and it fulfilled its purpose. Thus, in my mind, the prophecy was fulfilled. -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ochaye Member (Idle past 5268 days) Posts: 307 Joined: |
quote:If Mormons are perfect, it can. 'Whoever breaks one commandment is guilty of breaking them all.' Jas 2:10 GNB
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
kbertsche Member (Idle past 2161 days) Posts: 1427 From: San Jose, CA, USA Joined: |
quote:Mis-interpreted would be a better word. quote:No, I'm saying that the Book of Mormon contradicts Eph 2:8-10 and Titus 3:5 and many other passages in the Bible irrespective of how James 2 is interpreted. Even if James 2 is interpreted the way you would like, it doesn't make these other passages disappear. quote:The thread topic is not "What is the correct interpretation of James 2?" Rather, it is "Does the Book of Mormon contradict the Bible?" I've presented a contradiction between 2 Nephi 25:23 and Moroni 10:32 in the Book of Mormon, and Eph 2:8-10 and Titus 3:5 in the Bible. Either these passages do contradict, or they don't. Discussing James is interesting, but it does not deal with the contradiction that I've presented. For this we need to discuss the passages 2 Nephi 25:23, Moroni 10:32, Eph 2:8-10 and Titus 3:5. quote:No, but even if the Bible contained two contradictory statements (which I deny), and the BoM contradicted either of these, we would have satisfied the OP request for a place where "the Book of Mormon contradicts the Bible." BTW, is it standard Mormon doctrine to maintain that the Bible contradicts itself, as you seem to be doing? Do you believe that the Bible is the Word of God, and if so, how do you reconcile these two positions?
quote:And I claim that the BoM teaching on the means of salvation is consistent only with a misinterpretation of James. But whether or not either of these claims is correct is a red herring. It does not address the contradiction that I've presented between 2 Nephi 25:23 and Moroni 10:32 in the Book of Mormon, and Eph 2:8-10 and Titus 3:5 in the Bible. Edited by kbertsche, : No reason given.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024